Samsung Galaxy A20
$180
Samsung Galaxy A20 vs Samsung Galaxy S9
Samsung Galaxy S9
$720
| Galaxy A20 | Galaxy S9 | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | USD 180 | USD 720 |
| Battery | 4000 mAh | 3000 mAh |
| Charging (W) | 15 | 15 |
| RAM | 3 GB | 4 GB |
| Storage | 32 GB | 64 GB |
| Chipset | Samsung Exynos 7884 | Samsung Exynos 9810 |
| Display | 6.4" • Super AMOLED • 60Hz | 5.8" • Super AMOLED • 60Hz |
| Main Camera | 13MP | 12MP |
| Front Camera | 8MP | 8MP |
| OS | Android 9 | Android 8.0 |
Detailed comparison will load when you open this tab.
Key Differences
Only the differences that meaningfully separate these phones.
Price
USD 539.99 cheaper
Galaxy A20USD 180
vsGalaxy S9USD 720
RAM
1 GB more RAM
Galaxy S94 GB RAM
vsGalaxy A203 GB RAM
Storage
2× more storage
Galaxy S964 GB
vsGalaxy A2032 GB
Battery
33% larger battery
Galaxy A204,000 mAh
vsGalaxy S93,000 mAh
Performance
Different chipsets
Galaxy A20Samsung Exynos 7884
vsGalaxy S9Samsung Exynos 9810
Display
Larger display
Galaxy A206.4-inch
vsGalaxy S95.8-inch
Build
More compact thickness
Galaxy A207.8 mm
vsGalaxy S98.5 mm
Best For
Where each phone stands out based on this comparison.
Best if you want
More hardwareSamsung Galaxy A20
Much lower purchase priceUSD 180
Larger battery4,000 mAh
Larger 6.4-inch6.4-inch
Thinner body7.8 mm
Best if you want
More RAM and storageSamsung Galaxy S9
More RAM and storage4 GB RAM · 64 GB
What CompareTab says about Samsung Galaxy A20 vs Samsung Galaxy S9
Samsung Galaxy S9 has more RAM and storage than Galaxy A20, with 4 GB of RAM versus 3 GB and 64 GB of storage versus 32 GB. It also adds optical image stabilization on the main camera and wireless charging. Samsung Galaxy A20, however, is around $540 cheaper and thinner at 7.8 mm versus 8.5 mm and has a larger 4000 mAh battery versus 3000 mAh and a larger 6.4 inch display. The main trade-off is Galaxy S9’s extra RAM, storage, OIS-equipped camera setup, and wireless charging versus Galaxy A20’s lower price, larger battery, larger display, and thinner body.
