Samsung Galaxy S25 FE
$650
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE vs iQOO 15R 5G
iQOO 15R 5G
$499
| Galaxy S25 FE | 15R 5G | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | USD 650 | USD 499 |
| Battery | 4900 mAh | 7600 mAh |
| Charging (W) | 45 | 100 |
| RAM | 8 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage | 256 GB | 512 GB |
| Chipset | Samsung Exynos 2400 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5 |
| Display | 6.7" • Dynamic AMOLED 2X • 120Hz | 6.59" • AMOLED • 144Hz |
| Main Camera | 50MP | 50MP |
| Front Camera | 12MP | 32MP |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 16 |
Detailed comparison will load when you open this tab.
Key Differences
Only the differences that meaningfully separate these phones.
Price
USD 150.99 cheaper
15R 5GUSD 499
vsGalaxy S25 FEUSD 650
RAM
4 GB more RAM
15R 5G12 GB RAM
vsGalaxy S25 FE8 GB RAM
Storage
2× more storage
15R 5G512 GB
vsGalaxy S25 FE256 GB
Battery
55% larger battery
15R 5G7,600 mAh
vsGalaxy S25 FE4,900 mAh
Charging
55 W faster wired charging
15R 5G100 W wired
vsGalaxy S25 FE45 W wired
Performance
Different chipsets
Galaxy S25 FESamsung Exynos 2400
vs15R 5GQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5
Display
144 Hz refresh
15R 5G144 Hz
vsGalaxy S25 FE120 Hz
Best For
Where each phone stands out based on this comparison.
Best if you want
More hardwareiQOO 15R 5G
Much lower purchase priceUSD 499
More RAM and storage12 GB RAM · 512 GB
Larger battery7,600 mAh
Faster wired charging100 W wired
What CompareTab says about Samsung Galaxy S25 FE vs iQOO 15R 5G
iQOO 15R 5G has clear advantages in memory, battery capacity and display refresh rate over Galaxy S25 FE, with 12 GB of RAM versus 8 GB, 512 GB of storage versus 256 GB, a 7600 mAh battery versus 4900 mAh, and a 144 Hz display instead of 120 Hz. It also adds a higher-resolution front camera (32 MP versus 12 MP) and 100W charging. Samsung Galaxy S25 FE, however, is lighter at 190 g versus 202 g and thinner at 7.4 mm versus 7.9 mm. The main trade-off is 15R 5G’s extra RAM, storage, faster charging, battery capacity, and smoother display versus Galaxy S25 FE’s lighter, thinner build.
