Samsung Galaxy S10
$899
Samsung Galaxy S10 vs Motorola Razr 60
Motorola Razr 60
$699
| Galaxy S10 | Razr 60 | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | USD 899 | USD 699 |
| Battery | 3400 mAh | 4500 mAh |
| Charging (W) | 15 | 30 |
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Chipset | Samsung Exynos 9820 | MediaTek Dimensity 7400X |
| Display | 6.1" • Dynamic AMOLED • 60Hz | 6.9" • Foldable LTPO pOLED • 120Hz |
| Main Camera | 12MP | 50MP |
| Front Camera | 10MP | 32MP |
| OS | Android 9 | Android 15 |
Detailed comparison will load when you open this tab.
Key Differences
Only the differences that meaningfully separate these phones.
Price
USD 200 cheaper
Razr 60USD 699
vsGalaxy S10USD 899
Storage
2× more storage
Razr 60256 GB
vsGalaxy S10128 GB
Battery
32% larger battery
Razr 604,500 mAh
vsGalaxy S103,400 mAh
Charging
15 W faster wired charging
Razr 6030 W wired
vsGalaxy S1015 W wired
Performance
Different chipsets
Galaxy S10Samsung Exynos 9820
vsRazr 60MediaTek Dimensity 7400X
Display
Larger120Hz
Razr 606.9″ · 120Hz
vsGalaxy S106.1″ · 60Hz
Build
31 g lighter
Galaxy S10157 g
vsRazr 60188 g
Best For
Where each phone stands out based on this comparison.
Best if you want
More compactSamsung Galaxy S10
Lighter build157 g
Best if you want
More hardwareMotorola Razr 60
Much lower purchase priceUSD 699
More storage256 GB
Larger battery4,500 mAh
Faster wired charging30 W wired
What CompareTab says about Samsung Galaxy S10 vs Motorola Razr 60
Motorola Razr 60 has the larger display and faster wired charging than Galaxy S10, with 256 GB of storage versus 128 GB, a 4500 mAh battery versus 3400 mAh, a 120 Hz display instead of 60 Hz, and 30 W wired charging versus 15 W. It also adds a higher-resolution rear camera (50 MP versus 12 MP) and a higher-resolution front camera (32 MP versus 10 MP). Samsung Galaxy S10, however, is lighter at 157 g versus 188 g. The choice comes down to Razr 60’s storage, faster charging, battery capacity, smoother display, and higher-resolution cameras versus Galaxy S10’s lighter build.
