Samsung Galaxy Note 8
$929
Samsung Galaxy Note 8 vs Motorola Razr 60
Motorola Razr 60
$699
| Galaxy Note 8 | Razr 60 | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | USD 929 | USD 699 |
| Battery | 3300 mAh | 4500 mAh |
| Charging (W) | 15 | 30 |
| RAM | 6 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage | 64 GB | 256 GB |
| Chipset | Samsung Exynos 8895 | MediaTek Dimensity 7400X |
| Display | 6.3" • Super AMOLED • 60Hz | 6.9" • Foldable LTPO pOLED • 120Hz |
| Main Camera | 12MP | 50MP |
| Front Camera | 8MP | 32MP |
| OS | Android 7.1.1 | Android 15 |
Detailed comparison will load when you open this tab.
Key Differences
Only the differences that meaningfully separate these phones.
Price
USD 230 cheaper
Razr 60USD 699
vsGalaxy Note 8USD 929
RAM
2 GB more RAM
Razr 608 GB RAM
vsGalaxy Note 86 GB RAM
Storage
4× more storage
Razr 60256 GB
vsGalaxy Note 864 GB
Battery
36% larger battery
Razr 604,500 mAh
vsGalaxy Note 83,300 mAh
Charging
15 W faster wired charging
Razr 6030 W wired
vsGalaxy Note 815 W wired
Performance
Different chipsets
Galaxy Note 8Samsung Exynos 8895
vsRazr 60MediaTek Dimensity 7400X
Display
Larger120Hz
Razr 606.9″ · 120Hz
vsGalaxy Note 86.3″ · 60Hz
Best For
Where each phone stands out based on this comparison.
Best if you want
More hardwareMotorola Razr 60
Much lower purchase priceUSD 699
More RAM and storage8 GB RAM · 256 GB
Larger battery4,500 mAh
Faster wired charging30 W wired
What CompareTab says about Samsung Galaxy Note 8 vs Motorola Razr 60
Motorola Razr 60 has clear advantages in memory, battery capacity and display refresh rate over Galaxy Note 8, with 8 GB of RAM versus 6 GB, 256 GB of storage versus 64 GB, a 4500 mAh battery versus 3300 mAh, and a 120 Hz display instead of 60 Hz. It also adds a higher-resolution rear camera (50 MP versus 12 MP), a higher-resolution front camera (32 MP versus 8 MP), an ultrawide rear camera, and 30W charging.
