Samsung Galaxy M05
$95
Samsung Galaxy M05 vs POCO F9 Pro
POCO F9 Pro
$699
| Galaxy M05 | F9 Pro | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | USD 95 | USD 699 |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 6330 mAh |
| Charging (W) | 25 | 100 |
| RAM | 4 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage | 64 GB | 256 GB |
| Chipset | MediaTek Helio G85 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 V Series (SM8850-1-AB) |
| Display | 6.7" • PLS LCD • 60Hz | 6.59" • AMOLED • 185Hz |
| Main Camera | 50MP | 200MP |
| Front Camera | 8MP | 32MP |
| OS | Android 14 | Android 16 |
Detailed comparison will load when you open this tab.
Key Differences
Only the differences that meaningfully separate these phones.
Price
USD 604 cheaper
Galaxy M05USD 95
vsF9 ProUSD 699
RAM
3× more RAM
F9 Pro12 GB RAM
vsGalaxy M054 GB RAM
Storage
4× more storage
F9 Pro256 GB
vsGalaxy M0564 GB
Battery
27% larger battery
F9 Pro6,330 mAh
vsGalaxy M055,000 mAh
Charging
75 W faster wired charging
F9 Pro100 W wired
vsGalaxy M0525 W wired
Performance
Different chipsets
Galaxy M05MediaTek Helio G85
vsF9 ProQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 V Series (SM8850-1-AB)
Display
185 Hz refresh
F9 Pro185 Hz
vsGalaxy M0560 Hz
Best For
Where each phone stands out based on this comparison.
Best if you want
Lower priceSamsung Galaxy M05
Much lower purchase priceUSD 95
Best if you want
More hardwarePOCO F9 Pro
More RAM and storage12 GB RAM · 256 GB
Larger battery6,330 mAh
Faster wired charging100 W wired
Up to 185 Hz display6.59-inch
What CompareTab says about Samsung Galaxy M05 vs POCO F9 Pro
POCO F9 Pro has clear advantages in memory, battery capacity and display refresh rate over Galaxy M05, with 12 GB of RAM versus 4 GB, 256 GB of storage versus 64 GB, a 6330 mAh battery versus 5000 mAh, and a 185 Hz display instead of 60 Hz. It also adds a higher-resolution rear camera (200 MP versus 50 MP), optical image stabilization on the main camera, an ultrawide rear camera, and 100W charging. Samsung Galaxy M05, however, is around $604 cheaper and lighter at 195 g versus 206 g. The main trade-off is F9 Pro’s extra RAM, storage, faster charging, battery capacity, and smoother display versus Galaxy M05’s lower price and lighter build.
