Samsung Galaxy F56 5G
$305
Samsung Galaxy F56 5G vs Vivo V40e
Vivo V40e
$369
| Galaxy F56 5G | V40e | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | USD 305 | USD 369 |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 5500 mAh |
| Charging (W) | 45 | 80 |
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Chipset | Samsung Exynos 1480 | MediaTek Dimensity 7300 |
| Display | 6.7" • Super AMOLED Plus • 120Hz | 6.77" • 3D Curved AMOLED • 120Hz |
| Main Camera | 50MP | 50MP |
| Front Camera | 12MP | 50MP |
| OS | Android 15 | Android 14 |
Detailed comparison will load when you open this tab.
Key Differences
Only the differences that meaningfully separate these phones.
Price
USD 64 cheaper
Galaxy F56 5GUSD 305
vsV40eUSD 369
Storage
2× more storage
V40e256 GB
vsGalaxy F56 5G128 GB
Battery
10% larger battery
V40e5,500 mAh
vsGalaxy F56 5G5,000 mAh
Charging
35 W faster wired charging
V40e80 W wired
vsGalaxy F56 5G45 W wired
Performance
Different chipsets
Galaxy F56 5GSamsung Exynos 1480
vsV40eMediaTek Dimensity 7300
Camera
Higher-resolution front camera
V40e50MP front
vsGalaxy F56 5G12MP front
Connectivity
Adds NFC
Galaxy F56 5GNFC
vsV40eNo NFC listed
Best For
Where each phone stands out based on this comparison.
Best if you want
Lower priceSamsung Galaxy F56 5G
Much lower purchase priceUSD 305
NFCNFC
Best if you want
More hardwareVivo V40e
More storage256 GB
Larger battery5,500 mAh
Faster wired charging80 W wired
Higher-resolution front camera50MP front
What CompareTab says about Samsung Galaxy F56 5G vs Vivo V40e
Vivo V40e offers more storage than Galaxy F56 5G, with 256 GB of storage versus 128 GB, a 5500 mAh battery versus 5000 mAh, and 80 W wired charging versus 45 W. It also adds a higher-resolution front camera (50 MP versus 12 MP). Samsung Galaxy F56 5G, however, is around $64.00 cheaper. The main trade-off is V40e’s storage, faster charging, battery capacity, and higher-resolution front camera versus Galaxy F56 5G’s lower price.
