Compare Mobiles

close
Samsung Galaxy A72 256GB

Samsung Galaxy A72 256GB

$499

8 GB RAM 256 GB

close
vivo Y32 (2026)

vivo Y32 (2026)

$251

4 GB RAM 128 GB

Galaxy A72 256GBY32 (2026)
PriceUSD 499USD 251
Battery5000 mAh8000 mAh
Charging (W)2544
RAM8 GB4 GB
Storage256 GB128 GB
ChipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 720GUNISOC T7300
Display6.7" • Super AMOLED • 90Hz6.87" • LCD • 120Hz
Main Camera64MP50MP
Front Camera32MP8MP
OSAndroid 11Android 16

Detailed comparison will load when you open this tab.

Key Differences

Only the differences that meaningfully separate these phones.

Price
USD 248 cheaper
vsGalaxy A72 256GBUSD 499
RAM
2× more RAM
vsY32 (2026)4 GB RAM
Storage
2× more storage
vsY32 (2026)128 GB
Battery
60% larger battery
vsGalaxy A72 256GB5,000 mAh
Charging
19 W faster wired charging
vsGalaxy A72 256GB25 W wired
Performance
Different chipsets
vsY32 (2026)UNISOC T7300
Display
Larger120Hz
vsGalaxy A72 256GB6.7″ · 90Hz

Best For

Where each phone stands out based on this comparison.

Best if you want

Samsung Galaxy A72 256GB

More RAM and storage
More RAM and storage8 GB RAM · 256 GB
Best if you want

vivo Y32 (2026)

More hardware
Much lower purchase priceUSD 251
Larger battery8,000 mAh
Faster wired charging44 W wired
Larger 120Hz display6.87″ · 120Hz

What CompareTab says about Samsung Galaxy A72 256GB vs vivo Y32 (2026)

Samsung Galaxy A72 256GB offers more RAM and a more versatile camera setup than Y32 (2026), with 8 GB of RAM versus 4 GB, 256 GB of storage versus 128 GB, a higher-resolution 64 MP rear camera versus 50 MP, a higher-resolution 32 MP front camera versus 8 MP, an ultrawide rear camera, and a telephoto rear camera. vivo Y32 (2026), however, is around $248 cheaper and has a larger 8000 mAh battery versus 5000 mAh, a larger 6.87 inch display, and higher quoted peak brightness at 1300 nits versus 800 nits. The main trade-off is Galaxy A72 256GB’s extra RAM, storage, and camera features versus Y32 (2026)’s lower price, larger battery, larger display, and higher quoted peak brightness.