Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
$350
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G vs vivo X500
vivo X500
$764
| Galaxy A35 5G | X500 | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | USD 350 | USD 764 |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 7500 mAh |
| Charging (W) | 25 | 90 |
| RAM | 6 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Chipset | N/A | MediaTek Dimensity 9600M |
| Display | 6.6" • 120Hz | 6.59" • AMOLED • 144Hz |
| Main Camera | 50MP | 50MP |
| Front Camera | 13MP | 50MP |
| OS | Android 14 (One UI 6.1) | Android 17 |
Detailed comparison will load when you open this tab.
Key Differences
Only the differences that meaningfully separate these phones.
Price
USD 414 cheaper
Galaxy A35 5GUSD 350
vsX500USD 764
RAM
2× more RAM
X50012 GB RAM
vsGalaxy A35 5G6 GB RAM
Storage
2× more storage
X500256 GB
vsGalaxy A35 5G128 GB
Battery
50% larger battery
X5007,500 mAh
vsGalaxy A35 5G5,000 mAh
Charging
65 W faster wired charging
X50090 W wired
vsGalaxy A35 5G25 W wired
Display
144 Hz refresh
X500144 Hz
vsGalaxy A35 5G120 Hz
Camera
Higher-resolution front camera
X50050MP front
vsGalaxy A35 5G13MP front
Best For
Where each phone stands out based on this comparison.
Best if you want
Lower priceSamsung Galaxy A35 5G
Much lower purchase priceUSD 350
Best if you want
More hardwarevivo X500
More RAM and storage12 GB RAM · 256 GB
Larger battery7,500 mAh
Faster wired charging90 W wired
Up to 144 Hz display6.59-inch
What CompareTab says about Samsung Galaxy A35 5G vs vivo X500
vivo X500 offers more RAM, storage, battery capacity and a smoother display than Galaxy A35 5G, with 12 GB of RAM versus 6 GB, 256 GB of storage versus 128 GB, a 7500 mAh battery versus 5000 mAh, and a 144 Hz display instead of 120 Hz. It also adds a higher-resolution front camera (50 MP versus 13 MP), an ultrawide rear camera, a telephoto rear camera, and 90W charging. Samsung Galaxy A35 5G, however, is around $414 cheaper. The main trade-off is X500’s extra RAM, storage, faster charging, battery capacity, and smoother display versus Galaxy A35 5G’s lower price.
