OPPO Reno 16c
$539
OPPO Reno 16c vs Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
$350
| Reno 16c | Galaxy A35 5G | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | USD 539 | USD 350 |
| Battery | 7000 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Charging (W) | 80 | 25 |
| RAM | 8 GB | 6 GB |
| Storage | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 7300-Energy | N/A |
| Display | 6.57" • Crystal Guard AMOLED • 120Hz | 6.6" • 120Hz |
| Main Camera | 50MP | 50MP |
| Front Camera | 50MP | 13MP |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 14 (One UI 6.1) |
Detailed comparison will load when you open this tab.
Key Differences
Only the differences that meaningfully separate these phones.
Price
USD 189 cheaper
Galaxy A35 5GUSD 350
vsReno 16cUSD 539
RAM
2 GB more RAM
Reno 16c8 GB RAM
vsGalaxy A35 5G6 GB RAM
Battery
40% larger battery
Reno 16c7,000 mAh
vsGalaxy A35 5G5,000 mAh
Charging
55 W faster wired charging
Reno 16c80 W wired
vsGalaxy A35 5G25 W wired
Camera
Higher-resolution front camera
Reno 16c50MP front
vsGalaxy A35 5G13MP front
Connectivity
Adds NFC
Galaxy A35 5GNFC
vsReno 16cNo NFC listed
Best For
Where each phone stands out based on this comparison.
Best if you want
More hardwareOPPO Reno 16c
More RAM8 GB RAM
Larger battery7,000 mAh
Faster wired charging80 W wired
Higher-resolution front camera50MP front
Best if you want
Lower priceSamsung Galaxy A35 5G
Much lower purchase priceUSD 350
NFCNFC
What CompareTab says about OPPO Reno 16c vs Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
OPPO Reno 16c offers more RAM and faster wired charging than Galaxy A35 5G, with 8 GB of RAM versus 6 GB, a 7000 mAh battery versus 5000 mAh, and 80 W wired charging versus 25 W. It also adds a higher-resolution front camera (50 MP versus 13 MP), an ultrawide rear camera, and a telephoto rear camera. Samsung Galaxy A35 5G, however, is around $189 cheaper. The choice comes down to Reno 16c’s extra RAM, faster charging, battery capacity, and camera features versus Galaxy A35 5G’s lower price.
