Samsung Galaxy A27 5G
$349
Samsung Galaxy A27 5G vs vivo X300 E
vivo X300 E
$719
| Galaxy A27 5G | X300 E | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | USD 349 | USD 719 |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 7200 mAh |
| Charging (W) | 25 | 90 |
| RAM | 6 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5 |
| Display | 6.7" • Super AMOLED • 120Hz | 6.59" • AMOLED • 144Hz |
| Main Camera | 50MP | 50MP |
| Front Camera | 12MP | 50MP |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 16 |
Detailed comparison will load when you open this tab.
Key Differences
Only the differences that meaningfully separate these phones.
Price
USD 370 cheaper
Galaxy A27 5GUSD 349
vsX300 EUSD 719
RAM
2× more RAM
X300 E12 GB RAM
vsGalaxy A27 5G6 GB RAM
Storage
2× more storage
X300 E256 GB
vsGalaxy A27 5G128 GB
Battery
44% larger battery
X300 E7,200 mAh
vsGalaxy A27 5G5,000 mAh
Charging
65 W faster wired charging
X300 E90 W wired
vsGalaxy A27 5G25 W wired
Performance
Different chipsets
Galaxy A27 5GQualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3
vsX300 EQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5
Display
144 Hz refresh
X300 E144 Hz
vsGalaxy A27 5G120 Hz
Best For
Where each phone stands out based on this comparison.
Best if you want
Lower priceSamsung Galaxy A27 5G
Much lower purchase priceUSD 349
Best if you want
More hardwarevivo X300 E
More RAM and storage12 GB RAM · 256 GB
Larger battery7,200 mAh
Faster wired charging90 W wired
Up to 144 Hz display6.59-inch
What CompareTab says about Samsung Galaxy A27 5G vs vivo X300 E
vivo X300 E offers more RAM, storage, battery capacity and a smoother display than Galaxy A27 5G, with 12 GB of RAM versus 6 GB, 256 GB of storage versus 128 GB, a 7200 mAh battery versus 5000 mAh, and a 144 Hz display instead of 120 Hz. It also adds a higher-resolution front camera (50 MP versus 12 MP), a telephoto rear camera, and 90W charging. Samsung Galaxy A27 5G, however, is around $370 cheaper. The choice comes down to X300 E’s extra RAM, storage, faster charging, battery capacity, and smoother display versus Galaxy A27 5G’s lower price.
