Samsung Galaxy A25 5G
$299
Samsung Galaxy A25 5G vs Vivo Y36
Vivo Y36
$220
| Galaxy A25 5G | Y36 | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | USD 299 | USD 220 |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Charging (W) | 25 | 44 |
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage | 256 GB | 128 GB |
| Chipset | Samsung Exynos 1280 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 |
| Display | 6.5" • Super AMOLED • 120Hz | 6.64" • LCD • 90Hz |
| Main Camera | 50MP | 50MP |
| Front Camera | 13MP | 16MP |
| OS | Android 14 | Android 13 |
Detailed comparison will load when you open this tab.
Key Differences
Only the differences that meaningfully separate these phones.
Price
USD 79 cheaper
Y36USD 220
vsGalaxy A25 5GUSD 299
Storage
2× more storage
Galaxy A25 5G256 GB
vsY36128 GB
Charging
19 W faster wired charging
Y3644 W wired
vsGalaxy A25 5G25 W wired
Performance
Different chipsets
Galaxy A25 5GSamsung Exynos 1280
vsY36Qualcomm Snapdragon 680
Display
120 Hz refresh
Galaxy A25 5G120 Hz
vsY3690 Hz
Connectivity
Adds 5G
Galaxy A25 5G5G
vsY36No 5G listed
Connectivity
Adds NFC
Galaxy A25 5GNFC
vsY36No NFC listed
Best For
Where each phone stands out based on this comparison.
Best if you want
More hardwareSamsung Galaxy A25 5G
More storage256 GB
Up to 120 Hz display6.5-inch
5G connectivity5G
NFCNFC
Best if you want
Lower priceVivo Y36
Much lower purchase priceUSD 220
Faster wired charging44 W wired
What CompareTab says about Samsung Galaxy A25 5G vs Vivo Y36
Samsung Galaxy A25 5G offers more storage than Y36, with 256 GB of storage versus 128 GB, a 120 Hz display instead of 90 Hz, optical image stabilization on the main camera, an ultrawide rear camera, and NFC. Vivo Y36, however, is around $79.00 cheaper and supports faster wired charging at 44 W versus 25 W. The main trade-off is Galaxy A25 5G’s storage, smoother display, and OIS-equipped camera setup versus Y36’s lower price and faster charging.
