Compare Mobiles

close
Samsung Galaxy A20

Samsung Galaxy A20

$180

3 GB RAM 32 GB

close
vivo Y32 (2026)

vivo Y32 (2026)

$251

4 GB RAM 128 GB

Galaxy A20Y32 (2026)
PriceUSD 180USD 251
Battery4000 mAh8000 mAh
Charging (W)1544
RAM3 GB4 GB
Storage32 GB128 GB
ChipsetSamsung Exynos 7884UNISOC T7300
Display6.4" • Super AMOLED • 60Hz6.87" • LCD • 120Hz
Main Camera13MP50MP
Front Camera8MP8MP
OSAndroid 9Android 16

Detailed comparison will load when you open this tab.

Key Differences

Only the differences that meaningfully separate these phones.

Price
USD 71 cheaper
vsY32 (2026)USD 251
RAM
1 GB more RAM
vsGalaxy A203 GB RAM
Storage
4× more storage
vsGalaxy A2032 GB
Battery
100% larger battery
vsGalaxy A204,000 mAh
Charging
29 W faster wired charging
vsGalaxy A2015 W wired
Performance
Different chipsets
vsY32 (2026)UNISOC T7300
Display
Larger120Hz
vsGalaxy A206.4″ · 60Hz

Best For

Where each phone stands out based on this comparison.

Best if you want

Samsung Galaxy A20

Lower price
Much lower purchase priceUSD 180
Smaller 6.4-inch display6.4″
Best if you want

vivo Y32 (2026)

More hardware
More RAM and storage4 GB RAM · 128 GB
Larger battery8,000 mAh
Faster wired charging44 W wired
Larger 120Hz display6.87″ · 120Hz

What CompareTab says about Samsung Galaxy A20 vs vivo Y32 (2026)

vivo Y32 (2026) offers more RAM, storage, battery capacity and a smoother display than Galaxy A20, with 4 GB of RAM versus 3 GB, 128 GB of storage versus 32 GB, a 8000 mAh battery versus 4000 mAh, and a 120 Hz display instead of 60 Hz. It also adds a higher-resolution rear camera (50 MP versus 13 MP) and 44W charging. Samsung Galaxy A20, however, is around $71.00 cheaper, lighter at 169 g versus 229 g, and thinner at 7.8 mm versus 8.69 mm. The choice comes down to Y32 (2026)’s extra RAM, storage, faster charging, battery capacity, and smoother display versus Galaxy A20’s lower price and lighter, thinner build.