Samsung Galaxy A17
$199
Compare Mobiles
vivo Y32 (2026)
$251
| Galaxy A17 | Y32 (2026) | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | USD 199 | USD 251 |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 8000 mAh |
| Charging (W) | 25 | 44 |
| RAM | 6 GB | 4 GB |
| Storage | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Chipset | MediaTek Helio G99 | UNISOC T7300 |
| Display | 6.7" • Super AMOLED • 90Hz | 6.87" • LCD • 120Hz |
| Main Camera | 50MP | 50MP |
| Front Camera | 13MP | 8MP |
| OS | Android 15 | Android 16 |
Detailed comparison will load when you open this tab.
Key Differences
Only the differences that meaningfully separate these phones.
Price
USD 52 cheaper
Galaxy A17USD 199
vsY32 (2026)USD 251
RAM
2 GB more RAM
Galaxy A176 GB RAM
vsY32 (2026)4 GB RAM
Battery
60% larger battery
Y32 (2026)8,000 mAh
vsGalaxy A175,000 mAh
Charging
19 W faster wired charging
Y32 (2026)44 W wired
vsGalaxy A1725 W wired
Performance
Different chipsets
Galaxy A17MediaTek Helio G99
vsY32 (2026)UNISOC T7300
Display
Larger120Hz
Y32 (2026)6.87″ · 120Hz
vsGalaxy A176.7″ · 90Hz
Build
39 g lighter
Galaxy A17190 g
vsY32 (2026)229 g
Best For
Where each phone stands out based on this comparison.
Best if you want
Lower priceSamsung Galaxy A17
Much lower purchase priceUSD 199
More RAM6 GB RAM
Lighter build190 g
Smaller 6.7-inch display6.7″
Best if you want
More hardwarevivo Y32 (2026)
Larger battery8,000 mAh
Faster wired charging44 W wired
Larger 120Hz display6.87″ · 120Hz
What CompareTab says about Samsung Galaxy A17 vs vivo Y32 (2026)
vivo Y32 (2026) has the larger display and faster wired charging than Galaxy A17, with a 8000 mAh battery versus 5000 mAh, a 120 Hz display instead of 90 Hz, and 44 W wired charging versus 25 W. Samsung Galaxy A17, however, is around $52.00 cheaper, lighter at 190 g versus 229 g, and thinner at 7.5 mm versus 8.69 mm and has a higher-resolution 13 MP front camera. The main trade-off is the Y32 (2026)’s faster charging, battery capacity, and smoother display versus the Galaxy A17’s lower price, lighter, thinner build, and higher-resolution front camera.
