Samsung Galaxy A17
$199
Samsung Galaxy A17 vs vivo S2 FE
vivo S2 FE
$410
| Galaxy A17 | S2 FE | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | USD 199 | USD 410 |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 10000 mAh |
| Charging (W) | 25 | 44 |
| RAM | 6 GB | 6 GB |
| Storage | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Chipset | MediaTek Helio G99 | MediaTek Dimensity 7300e |
| Display | 6.7" • Super AMOLED • 90Hz | 6.83" • AMOLED • 120Hz |
| Main Camera | 50MP | 50MP |
| Front Camera | 13MP | 32MP |
| OS | Android 15 | Android 16 |
Detailed comparison will load when you open this tab.
Key Differences
Only the differences that meaningfully separate these phones.
Price
USD 211 cheaper
Galaxy A17USD 199
vsS2 FEUSD 410
Battery
100% larger battery
S2 FE10,000 mAh
vsGalaxy A175,000 mAh
Charging
19 W faster wired charging
S2 FE44 W wired
vsGalaxy A1725 W wired
Performance
Different chipsets
Galaxy A17MediaTek Helio G99
vsS2 FEMediaTek Dimensity 7300e
Display
120 Hz refresh
S2 FE120 Hz
vsGalaxy A1790 Hz
Build
34 g lighter
Galaxy A17190 g
vsS2 FE224 g
Build
More compact thickness
Galaxy A177.5 mm
vsS2 FE8.59 mm
Best For
Where each phone stands out based on this comparison.
Best if you want
Lower priceSamsung Galaxy A17
Much lower purchase priceUSD 199
Lighter build190 g
Thinner body7.5 mm
Best if you want
More hardwarevivo S2 FE
Larger battery10,000 mAh
Faster wired charging44 W wired
Up to 120 Hz display6.83-inch
What CompareTab says about Samsung Galaxy A17 vs vivo S2 FE
vivo S2 FE has the larger display and faster wired charging than Galaxy A17, with a 10000 mAh battery versus 5000 mAh, a 120 Hz display instead of 90 Hz, and 44 W wired charging versus 25 W. It also adds a higher-resolution front camera (32 MP versus 13 MP). Samsung Galaxy A17, however, is around $211 cheaper, lighter at 190 g versus 224 g, and thinner at 7.5 mm versus 8.59 mm. The main trade-off is the S2 FE’s faster charging, battery capacity, smoother display, and higher-resolution front camera versus the Galaxy A17’s lower price and lighter, thinner build.
