Samsung Galaxy A17 8GB
$225
Samsung Galaxy A17 8GB vs Vivo V40e
Vivo V40e
$369
| Galaxy A17 8GB | V40e | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | USD 225 | USD 369 |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 5500 mAh |
| Charging (W) | 25 | 80 |
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Chipset | MediaTek Helio G99 | MediaTek Dimensity 7300 |
| Display | 6.7" • Super AMOLED • 90Hz | 6.77" • 3D Curved AMOLED • 120Hz |
| Main Camera | 50MP | 50MP |
| Front Camera | 13MP | 50MP |
| OS | Android 15 | Android 14 |
Detailed comparison will load when you open this tab.
Key Differences
Only the differences that meaningfully separate these phones.
Price
USD 144 cheaper
Galaxy A17 8GBUSD 225
vsV40eUSD 369
Battery
10% larger battery
V40e5,500 mAh
vsGalaxy A17 8GB5,000 mAh
Charging
55 W faster wired charging
V40e80 W wired
vsGalaxy A17 8GB25 W wired
Performance
Different chipsets
Galaxy A17 8GBMediaTek Helio G99
vsV40eMediaTek Dimensity 7300
Display
120 Hz refresh
V40e120 Hz
vsGalaxy A17 8GB90 Hz
Build
9 g lighter
V40e183 g
vsGalaxy A17 8GB192 g
Camera
Higher-resolution front camera
V40e50MP front
vsGalaxy A17 8GB13MP front
Best For
Where each phone stands out based on this comparison.
Best if you want
Lower priceSamsung Galaxy A17 8GB
Much lower purchase priceUSD 225
Best if you want
More hardwareVivo V40e
Larger battery5,500 mAh
Faster wired charging80 W wired
Up to 120 Hz display6.77-inch
Lighter build183 g
What CompareTab says about Samsung Galaxy A17 8GB vs Vivo V40e
Vivo V40e has the larger display and faster wired charging than Galaxy A17 8GB, with a 5500 mAh battery versus 5000 mAh, a 120 Hz display instead of 90 Hz, and 80 W wired charging versus 25 W. It also adds a higher-resolution front camera (50 MP versus 13 MP). Samsung Galaxy A17 8GB, however, is around $144 cheaper. The main trade-off is V40e’s faster charging, battery capacity, smoother display, and higher-resolution front camera versus Galaxy A17 8GB’s lower price.
