Redmi A5
$89
Redmi A5 vs OPPO A7 Pro Max 5G
OPPO A7 Pro Max 5G
$325
| A5 | A7 Pro Max 5G | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | USD 89 | USD 325 |
| Battery | 5200 mAh | 10000 mAh |
| Charging (W) | 15 | 80 |
| RAM | 4 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Chipset | UNISOC T7250 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 5 |
| Display | 6.88" • IPS LCD • 120Hz | 6.78" • Flexible AMOLED • 120Hz |
| Main Camera | 32MP | 50MP |
| Front Camera | 8MP | 50MP |
| OS | Android 15 Go Edition | Android 16 |
Detailed comparison will load when you open this tab.
Key Differences
Only the differences that meaningfully separate these phones.
Price
USD 236 cheaper
A5USD 89
vsA7 Pro Max 5GUSD 325
RAM
2× more RAM
A7 Pro Max 5G8 GB RAM
vsA54 GB RAM
Storage
2× more storage
A7 Pro Max 5G256 GB
vsA5128 GB
Battery
92% larger battery
A7 Pro Max 5G10,000 mAh
vsA55,200 mAh
Charging
65 W faster wired charging
A7 Pro Max 5G80 W wired
vsA515 W wired
Performance
Different chipsets
A5UNISOC T7250
vsA7 Pro Max 5GQualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 5
Build
31 g lighter
A5193 g
vsA7 Pro Max 5G224 g
Best For
Where each phone stands out based on this comparison.
Best if you want
Lower priceRedmi A5
Much lower purchase priceUSD 89
Lighter build193 g
Best if you want
More hardwareOPPO A7 Pro Max 5G
More RAM and storage8 GB RAM · 256 GB
Larger battery10,000 mAh
Faster wired charging80 W wired
What CompareTab says about Redmi A5 vs OPPO A7 Pro Max 5G
OPPO A7 Pro Max 5G combines more RAM and storage with faster wired charging than A5, with 8 GB of RAM versus 4 GB, 256 GB of storage versus 128 GB, a 10000 mAh battery versus 5200 mAh, and 80 W wired charging versus 15 W. It also adds a higher-resolution rear camera (50 MP versus 32 MP), a higher-resolution front camera (50 MP versus 8 MP), and optical image stabilization on the main camera. Redmi A5, however, is around $236 cheaper, lighter at 193 g versus 224 g, and thinner at 8.26 mm versus 8.57 mm. The choice comes down to A7 Pro Max 5G’s extra RAM, storage, faster charging, battery capacity, and OIS-equipped camera setup versus A5’s lower price and lighter, thinner build.
