Redmi A3x
$75
Compare Mobiles
vivo Y32 (2026)
$251
| A3x | Y32 (2026) | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | USD 75 | USD 251 |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 8000 mAh |
| Charging (W) | 10 | 44 |
| RAM | 3 GB | 4 GB |
| Storage | 64 GB | 128 GB |
| Chipset | Unisoc T603 | UNISOC T7300 |
| Display | 6.71" • IPS LCD • 90Hz | 6.87" • LCD • 120Hz |
| Main Camera | 8MP | 50MP |
| Front Camera | 5MP | 8MP |
| OS | Android 14 (Go Edition) | Android 16 |
Detailed comparison will load when you open this tab.
Key Differences
Only the differences that meaningfully separate these phones.
Price
USD 176 cheaper
A3xUSD 75
vsY32 (2026)USD 251
RAM
1 GB more RAM
Y32 (2026)4 GB RAM
vsA3x3 GB RAM
Storage
2× more storage
Y32 (2026)128 GB
vsA3x64 GB
Battery
60% larger battery
Y32 (2026)8,000 mAh
vsA3x5,000 mAh
Charging
34 W faster wired charging
Y32 (2026)44 W wired
vsA3x10 W wired
Performance
Different chipsets
A3xUnisoc T603
vsY32 (2026)UNISOC T7300
Display
Larger120Hz
Y32 (2026)6.87″ · 120Hz
vsA3x6.71″ · 90Hz
Best For
Where each phone stands out based on this comparison.
Best if you want
Lower priceRedmi A3x
Much lower purchase priceUSD 75
Smaller 6.71-inch display6.71″
Best if you want
More hardwarevivo Y32 (2026)
More RAM and storage4 GB RAM · 128 GB
Larger battery8,000 mAh
Faster wired charging44 W wired
Larger 120Hz display6.87″ · 120Hz
What CompareTab says about Redmi A3x vs vivo Y32 (2026)
vivo Y32 (2026) offers more RAM, storage, battery capacity and a smoother display than A3x, with 4 GB of RAM versus 3 GB, 128 GB of storage versus 64 GB, a 8000 mAh battery versus 5000 mAh, and a 120 Hz display instead of 90 Hz. It also adds a higher-resolution rear camera (50 MP versus 8 MP), NFC, and 44W charging. Redmi A3x, however, is around $176 cheaper, lighter at 193 g versus 229 g, and thinner at 8.3 mm versus 8.69 mm. The main trade-off is the Y32 (2026)’s extra RAM, storage, faster charging, battery capacity, and smoother display versus the A3x’s lower price and lighter, thinner build.
