Realme Note 50
$64
Realme Note 50 vs POCO F9 Pro
POCO F9 Pro
$699
| Note 50 | F9 Pro | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | USD 64 | USD 699 |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 6330 mAh |
| Charging (W) | 10 | 100 |
| RAM | 4 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage | 64 GB | 256 GB |
| Chipset | Unisoc Tiger T612 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 V Series (SM8850-1-AB) |
| Display | 6.74" • IPS LCD • 90Hz | 6.59" • AMOLED • 185Hz |
| Main Camera | 13MP | 200MP |
| Front Camera | 5MP | 32MP |
| OS | Android 13 | Android 16 |
Detailed comparison will load when you open this tab.
Key Differences
Only the differences that meaningfully separate these phones.
Price
USD 635 cheaper
Note 50USD 64
vsF9 ProUSD 699
RAM
3× more RAM
F9 Pro12 GB RAM
vsNote 504 GB RAM
Storage
4× more storage
F9 Pro256 GB
vsNote 5064 GB
Battery
27% larger battery
F9 Pro6,330 mAh
vsNote 505,000 mAh
Charging
90 W faster wired charging
F9 Pro100 W wired
vsNote 5010 W wired
Performance
Different chipsets
Note 50Unisoc Tiger T612
vsF9 ProQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 V Series (SM8850-1-AB)
Display
Larger display
Note 506.74-inch
vsF9 Pro6.59-inch
Best For
Where each phone stands out based on this comparison.
Best if you want
Lower priceRealme Note 50
Much lower purchase priceUSD 64
Larger 6.74-inch6.74-inch
Best if you want
More hardwarePOCO F9 Pro
More RAM and storage12 GB RAM · 256 GB
Larger battery6,330 mAh
Faster wired charging100 W wired
What CompareTab says about Realme Note 50 vs POCO F9 Pro
POCO F9 Pro has clear advantages in memory, battery capacity and display refresh rate over Note 50, with 12 GB of RAM versus 4 GB, 256 GB of storage versus 64 GB, a 6330 mAh battery versus 5000 mAh, and a 185 Hz display instead of 90 Hz. It also adds a higher-resolution rear camera (200 MP versus 13 MP), optical image stabilization on the main camera, an ultrawide rear camera, and 100W charging. Realme Note 50, however, is around $635 cheaper, lighter at 186 g versus 206 g, and thinner at 7.99 mm versus 8.79 mm and has a larger 6.74 inch display. The main trade-off is the F9 Pro’s extra RAM, storage, faster charging, battery capacity, and smoother display versus the Note 50’s lower price, larger display, and lighter, thinner build.
