Realme C65
$149
Realme C65 vs POCO F9 Ultra
POCO F9 Ultra
$799
| C65 | F9 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | USD 149 | USD 799 |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 8050 mAh |
| Charging (W) | 45 | 100 |
| RAM | 8 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Chipset | MediaTek Helio G85 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 (SM8850-AC) |
| Display | 6.67" • IPS LCD • 90Hz | 6.9" • AMOLED • 185Hz |
| Main Camera | 50MP | 200MP |
| Front Camera | 8MP | 32MP |
| OS | Android 14 | Android 16 |
Detailed comparison will load when you open this tab.
Key Differences
Only the differences that meaningfully separate these phones.
Price
USD 650 cheaper
C65USD 149
vsF9 UltraUSD 799
RAM
4 GB more RAM
F9 Ultra12 GB RAM
vsC658 GB RAM
Battery
61% larger battery
F9 Ultra8,050 mAh
vsC655,000 mAh
Charging
55 W faster wired charging
F9 Ultra100 W wired
vsC6545 W wired
Performance
Different chipsets
C65MediaTek Helio G85
vsF9 UltraQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 (SM8850-AC)
Display
Larger185Hz
F9 Ultra6.9″ · 185Hz
vsC656.67″ · 90Hz
Build
50 g lighter
C65185 g
vsF9 Ultra235 g
Best For
Where each phone stands out based on this comparison.
Best if you want
Lower priceRealme C65
Much lower purchase priceUSD 149
Lighter build185 g
Smaller 6.67-inch display6.67″
Best if you want
More hardwarePOCO F9 Ultra
More RAM12 GB RAM
Larger battery8,050 mAh
Faster wired charging100 W wired
Larger 185Hz display6.9″ · 185Hz
What CompareTab says about Realme C65 vs POCO F9 Ultra
POCO F9 Ultra offers more RAM and faster wired charging than C65, with 12 GB of RAM versus 8 GB, a 8050 mAh battery versus 5000 mAh, a 185 Hz display instead of 90 Hz, and 100 W wired charging versus 45 W. It also adds a higher-resolution rear camera (200 MP versus 50 MP), optical image stabilization on the main camera, and an ultrawide rear camera. Realme C65, however, is around $650 cheaper, lighter at 185 g versus 235 g, and thinner at 7.64 mm versus 8.74 mm. The main trade-off is F9 Ultra’s extra RAM, faster charging, battery capacity, smoother display, and OIS-equipped camera setup versus C65’s lower price and lighter, thinner build.
