Realme C65
$149
Realme C65 vs Alcatel Pixi
Alcatel Pixi
$99
| C65 | Pixi | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | USD 149 | USD 99 |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 1300 mAh |
| Charging (W) | 45 | 5 |
| RAM | 8 GB | N/A |
| Storage | 256 GB | N/A |
| Chipset | MediaTek Helio G85 | Qualcomm MSM7227A |
| Display | 6.67" • IPS LCD • 90Hz | 3.5" • TFT LCD • 60Hz |
| Main Camera | 50MP | 2MP |
| Front Camera | 8MP | 0MP |
| OS | Android 14 | Android 2.3.6 Gingerbread |
Detailed comparison will load when you open this tab.
Key Differences
Only the differences that meaningfully separate these phones.
Price
USD 50 cheaper
PixiUSD 99
vsC65USD 149
RAM
8 GB more RAM
C658 GB RAM
vsPixi0 GB RAM
Storage
256 GB more storage
C65256 GB
vsPixi0 GB
Battery
285% larger battery
C655,000 mAh
vsPixi1,300 mAh
Charging
40 W faster wired charging
C6545 W wired
vsPixi5 W wired
Performance
Different chipsets
C65MediaTek Helio G85
vsPixiQualcomm MSM7227A
Display
Larger90Hz
C656.67″ · 90Hz
vsPixi3.5″ · 60Hz
Best For
Where each phone stands out based on this comparison.
Best if you want
More hardwareRealme C65
More RAM and storage8 GB RAM · 256 GB
Larger battery5,000 mAh
Faster wired charging45 W wired
Larger 90Hz display6.67″ · 90Hz
Best if you want
Lower priceAlcatel Pixi
Much lower purchase priceUSD 99
Smaller 3.5-inch display3.5″
What CompareTab says about Realme C65 vs Alcatel Pixi
Realme C65 has clear advantages in memory, battery capacity and display refresh rate over Pixi, with 8 GB of RAM versus 0.26 GB, 256 GB of storage versus 0.51 GB, a 5000 mAh battery versus 1300 mAh, and a 90 Hz display instead of 60 Hz. It also adds a higher-resolution rear camera (50 MP versus 2 MP), a higher-resolution front camera (8 MP versus 0 MP), NFC, and 45W charging. Alcatel Pixi, however, is around $50.00 cheaper and lighter at 118 g versus 185 g. The main trade-off is C65’s extra RAM, storage, faster charging, battery capacity, and smoother display versus Pixi’s lower price and lighter build.
