Poco C95 Pro
$246
Poco C95 Pro vs Tecno Spark 50C
Tecno Spark 50C
$178
| C95 Pro | Spark 50C | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | USD 246 | USD 178 |
| Battery | 7500 mAh | 5200 mAh |
| Charging (W) | 45 | 15 |
| RAM | 6 GB | 4 GB |
| Storage | 128 GB | 64 GB |
| Chipset | MediaTek Helio G91-Ultra | MediaTek Helio G81 |
| Display | 6.9" • LCD • 120Hz | 6.78" • IPS LCD • 120Hz |
| Main Camera | 50MP | 13MP |
| Front Camera | 8MP | 8MP |
| OS | Android | Android 16 |
Detailed comparison will load when you open this tab.
Key Differences
Only the differences that meaningfully separate these phones.
Price
USD 68 cheaper
Spark 50CUSD 178
vsC95 ProUSD 246
RAM
2 GB more RAM
C95 Pro6 GB RAM
vsSpark 50C4 GB RAM
Storage
2× more storage
C95 Pro128 GB
vsSpark 50C64 GB
Battery
44% larger battery
C95 Pro7,500 mAh
vsSpark 50C5,200 mAh
Charging
30 W faster wired charging
C95 Pro45 W wired
vsSpark 50C15 W wired
Performance
Different chipsets
C95 ProMediaTek Helio G91-Ultra
vsSpark 50CMediaTek Helio G81
Camera
Higher-resolution main camera
C95 Pro50MP rear
vsSpark 50C13MP rear
Best For
Where each phone stands out based on this comparison.
Best if you want
More hardwarePoco C95 Pro
More RAM and storage6 GB RAM · 128 GB
Larger battery7,500 mAh
Faster wired charging45 W wired
Higher-resolution main camera50MP rear
Best if you want
Lower priceTecno Spark 50C
Much lower purchase priceUSD 178
What CompareTab says about Poco C95 Pro vs Tecno Spark 50C
Poco C95 Pro combines more RAM and storage with faster wired charging than Spark 50C, with 6 GB of RAM versus 4 GB, 128 GB of storage versus 64 GB, a 7500 mAh battery versus 5200 mAh, and 45 W wired charging versus 15 W. It also adds a higher-resolution rear camera (50 MP versus 13 MP). Tecno Spark 50C, however, is around $68.00 cheaper and thinner at 7.9 mm versus 8.8 mm. The main trade-off is C95 Pro’s extra RAM, storage, faster charging, battery capacity, and higher-resolution front camera versus Spark 50C’s lower price and thinner body.
