OPPO Reno16 Pro
$1,035
OPPO Reno16 Pro vs vivo X300 E
vivo X300 E
$719
| Reno16 Pro | X300 E | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | USD 1,035 | USD 719 |
| Battery | 6700 mAh | 7200 mAh |
| Charging (W) | 80 | 90 |
| RAM | 12 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 8550 Super | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5 |
| Display | 6.32" • Crystal Guard+ AMOLED • 144Hz | 6.59" • AMOLED • 144Hz |
| Main Camera | 200MP | 50MP |
| Front Camera | 50MP | 50MP |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 16 |
Detailed comparison will load when you open this tab.
Key Differences
Only the differences that meaningfully separate these phones.
Price
USD 316 cheaper
X300 EUSD 719
vsReno16 ProUSD 1,035
Battery
7% larger battery
X300 E7,200 mAh
vsReno16 Pro6,700 mAh
Charging
10 W faster wired charging
X300 E90 W wired
vsReno16 Pro80 W wired
Performance
Different chipsets
Reno16 ProMediaTek Dimensity 8550 Super
vsX300 EQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5
Display
Larger display
X300 E6.59-inch
vsReno16 Pro6.32-inch
Build
12 g lighter
Reno16 Pro188 g
vsX300 E199.5 g
Camera
Higher-resolution main camera
Reno16 Pro200MP rear
vsX300 E50MP rear
Best For
Where each phone stands out based on this comparison.
Best if you want
More compactOPPO Reno16 Pro
Lighter build188 g
Higher-resolution main camera200MP rear
Best if you want
More hardwarevivo X300 E
Much lower purchase priceUSD 719
Larger battery7,200 mAh
Faster wired charging90 W wired
Larger 6.59-inch6.59-inch
What CompareTab says about OPPO Reno16 Pro vs vivo X300 E
vivo X300 E has the larger display and faster wired charging than Reno16 Pro, with a 7200 mAh battery versus 6700 mAh, a 6.59 inch display versus 6.32 inch, and 90 W wired charging versus 80 W. OPPO Reno16 Pro, however, is lighter at 188 g versus 199.5 g. The main trade-off is X300 E’s faster charging, battery capacity, and larger display versus Reno16 Pro’s lighter build.
