OnePlus One
$299
OnePlus One vs OPPO Reno 15F
OPPO Reno 15F
$449
| One | Reno 15F | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | USD 299 | USD 449 |
| Battery | 3100 mAh | 7000 mAh |
| Charging (W) | 10 | 80 |
| RAM | 3 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage | 64 GB | 256 GB |
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 MSM8974AC | Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 |
| Display | 5.5" • LTPS IPS LCD • 60Hz | 6.57" • AMOLED • 120Hz |
| Main Camera | 13MP | 50MP |
| Front Camera | 5MP | 50MP |
| OS | Android 4.4.2 KitKat | Android 16 |
Detailed comparison will load when you open this tab.
Key Differences
Only the differences that meaningfully separate these phones.
Price
USD 150 cheaper
OneUSD 299
vsReno 15FUSD 449
RAM
5 GB more RAM
Reno 15F8 GB RAM
vsOne3 GB RAM
Storage
4× more storage
Reno 15F256 GB
vsOne64 GB
Battery
126% larger battery
Reno 15F7,000 mAh
vsOne3,100 mAh
Charging
70 W faster wired charging
Reno 15F80 W wired
vsOne10 W wired
Performance
Different chipsets
OneQualcomm Snapdragon 801 MSM8974AC
vsReno 15FQualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1
Display
Larger120Hz
Reno 15F6.57″ · 120Hz
vsOne5.5″ · 60Hz
Best For
Where each phone stands out based on this comparison.
Best if you want
Lower priceOnePlus One
Much lower purchase priceUSD 299
Smaller 5.5-inch display5.5″
Best if you want
More hardwareOPPO Reno 15F
More RAM and storage8 GB RAM · 256 GB
Larger battery7,000 mAh
Faster wired charging80 W wired
Larger 120Hz display6.57″ · 120Hz
What CompareTab says about OnePlus One vs OPPO Reno 15F
OPPO Reno 15F has clear advantages in memory, battery capacity and display refresh rate over One, with 8 GB of RAM versus 3 GB, 256 GB of storage versus 64 GB, a 7000 mAh battery versus 3100 mAh, and a 120 Hz display instead of 60 Hz. It also adds a higher-resolution rear camera (50 MP versus 13 MP), a higher-resolution front camera (50 MP versus 5 MP), optical image stabilization on the main camera, and 80W charging. OnePlus One, however, is around $150 cheaper and lighter at 162 g versus 195 g. The main trade-off is Reno 15F’s extra RAM, storage, faster charging, battery capacity, and smoother display versus One’s lower price and lighter build.
