OnePlus 3T
$439
OnePlus 3T vs vivo X500 Pro
vivo X500 Pro
$903
| 3T | X500 Pro | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | USD 439 | USD 903 |
| Battery | 3400 mAh | 6510 mAh |
| Charging (W) | 20 | 90 |
| RAM | 6 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage | 64 GB | 256 GB |
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 | MediaTek Dimensity 9600 Pro |
| Display | 5.5" • Optic AMOLED • 60Hz | 6.36" • LTPO AMOLED (8T) • 144Hz |
| Main Camera | 16MP | 50MP |
| Front Camera | 16MP | 50MP |
| OS | Android 6.0.1 Marshmallow | Android 17 |
Detailed comparison will load when you open this tab.
Key Differences
Only the differences that meaningfully separate these phones.
Price
USD 464 cheaper
3TUSD 439
vsX500 ProUSD 903
RAM
2× more RAM
X500 Pro12 GB RAM
vs3T6 GB RAM
Storage
4× more storage
X500 Pro256 GB
vs3T64 GB
Battery
91% larger battery
X500 Pro6,510 mAh
vs3T3,400 mAh
Charging
70 W faster wired charging
X500 Pro90 W wired
vs3T20 W wired
Performance
Different chipsets
3TQualcomm Snapdragon 821
vsX500 ProMediaTek Dimensity 9600 Pro
Display
Larger144Hz
X500 Pro6.36″ · 144Hz
vs3T5.5″ · 60Hz
Best For
Where each phone stands out based on this comparison.
Best if you want
Lower priceOnePlus 3T
Much lower purchase priceUSD 439
Smaller 5.5-inch display5.5″
Best if you want
More hardwarevivo X500 Pro
More RAM and storage12 GB RAM · 256 GB
Larger battery6,510 mAh
Faster wired charging90 W wired
Larger 144Hz display6.36″ · 144Hz
What CompareTab says about OnePlus 3T vs vivo X500 Pro
vivo X500 Pro offers more RAM, storage, battery capacity and a smoother display than 3T, with 12 GB of RAM versus 6 GB, 256 GB of storage versus 64 GB, a 6510 mAh battery versus 3400 mAh, and a 144 Hz display instead of 60 Hz. It also adds a higher-resolution rear camera (50 MP versus 16 MP), a higher-resolution front camera (50 MP versus 16 MP), an ultrawide rear camera, and 90W charging. OnePlus 3T, however, is around $464 cheaper, lighter at 158 g versus 192 g, and thinner at 7.35 mm versus 7.95 mm. The choice comes down to X500 Pro’s extra RAM, storage, faster charging, battery capacity, and smoother display versus 3T’s lower price and lighter, thinner build.
