OPPO Reno 16c
$539
OPPO Reno 16c vs vivo X300 E
vivo X300 E
$719
| Reno 16c | X300 E | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | USD 539 | USD 719 |
| Battery | 7000 mAh | 7200 mAh |
| Charging (W) | 80 | 90 |
| RAM | 8 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 7300-Energy | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5 |
| Display | 6.57" • Crystal Guard AMOLED • 120Hz | 6.59" • AMOLED • 144Hz |
| Main Camera | 50MP | 50MP |
| Front Camera | 50MP | 50MP |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 16 |
Detailed comparison will load when you open this tab.
Key Differences
Only the differences that meaningfully separate these phones.
Price
USD 180 cheaper
Reno 16cUSD 539
vsX300 EUSD 719
RAM
4 GB more RAM
X300 E12 GB RAM
vsReno 16c8 GB RAM
Storage
2× more storage
X300 E256 GB
vsReno 16c128 GB
Battery
200 mAh larger battery
X300 E7,200 mAh
vsReno 16c7,000 mAh
Charging
10 W faster wired charging
X300 E90 W wired
vsReno 16c80 W wired
Performance
Different chipsets
Reno 16cMediaTek Dimensity 7300-Energy
vsX300 EQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5
Display
144 Hz refresh
X300 E144 Hz
vsReno 16c120 Hz
Best For
Where each phone stands out based on this comparison.
Best if you want
Lower priceOPPO Reno 16c
Much lower purchase priceUSD 539
Best if you want
More hardwarevivo X300 E
More RAM and storage12 GB RAM · 256 GB
Larger battery7,200 mAh
Faster wired charging90 W wired
Up to 144 Hz display6.59-inch
What CompareTab says about OPPO Reno 16c vs vivo X300 E
vivo X300 E offers more RAM, storage, battery capacity and a smoother display than Reno 16c, with 12 GB of RAM versus 8 GB, 256 GB of storage versus 128 GB, a 7200 mAh battery versus 7000 mAh, and a 144 Hz display instead of 120 Hz. It also adds NFC and 90W charging. OPPO Reno 16c, however, is around $180 cheaper. The choice comes down to X300 E’s extra RAM, storage, faster charging, battery capacity, and smoother display versus Reno 16c’s lower price.
