OPPO F17 Pro
$313
OPPO F17 Pro vs OPPO Reno 14F
OPPO Reno 14F
$499
| F17 Pro | Reno 14F | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | USD 313 | USD 499 |
| Battery | 4015 mAh | 6000 mAh |
| Charging (W) | 30 | 45 |
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Chipset | MediaTek Helio P95 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 SM6450 |
| Display | 6.43" • Super AMOLED • 60Hz | 6.57" • Flexible AMOLED • 120Hz |
| Main Camera | 48MP | 50MP |
| Front Camera | 16MP | 32MP |
| OS | Android 10 | Android 15 |
Detailed comparison will load when you open this tab.
Key Differences
Only the differences that meaningfully separate these phones.
Price
USD 186 cheaper
F17 ProUSD 313
vsReno 14FUSD 499
Storage
2× more storage
Reno 14F256 GB
vsF17 Pro128 GB
Battery
49% larger battery
Reno 14F6,000 mAh
vsF17 Pro4,015 mAh
Charging
15 W faster wired charging
Reno 14F45 W wired
vsF17 Pro30 W wired
Performance
Different chipsets
F17 ProMediaTek Helio P95
vsReno 14FQualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 SM6450
Display
120 Hz refresh
Reno 14F120 Hz
vsF17 Pro60 Hz
Build
16 g lighter
F17 Pro164 g
vsReno 14F180 g
Best For
Where each phone stands out based on this comparison.
Best if you want
Lower priceOPPO F17 Pro
Much lower purchase priceUSD 313
Lighter build164 g
Best if you want
More hardwareOPPO Reno 14F
More storage256 GB
Larger battery6,000 mAh
Faster wired charging45 W wired
Up to 120 Hz display6.57-inch
What CompareTab says about OPPO F17 Pro vs OPPO Reno 14F
OPPO Reno 14F has the larger display and faster wired charging than F17 Pro, with 256 GB of storage versus 128 GB, a 6000 mAh battery versus 4015 mAh, a 120 Hz display instead of 60 Hz, and 45 W wired charging versus 30 W. It also adds a higher-resolution front camera (32 MP versus 16 MP), optical image stabilization on the main camera, and NFC. OPPO F17 Pro, however, is around $186 cheaper and lighter at 164 g versus 180 g. The choice comes down to Reno 14F’s storage, faster charging, battery capacity, smoother display, and OIS-equipped camera setup versus F17 Pro’s lower price and lighter build.
