OPPO F17 Pro
$313
OPPO F17 Pro vs Vivo Y200 256GB
Vivo Y200 256GB
$235
| F17 Pro | Y200 256GB | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | USD 313 | USD 235 |
| Battery | 4015 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Charging (W) | 30 | 80 |
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Chipset | MediaTek Helio P95 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 |
| Display | 6.43" • Super AMOLED • 60Hz | 6.67" • AMOLED • 120Hz |
| Main Camera | 48MP | 50MP |
| Front Camera | 16MP | 32MP |
| OS | Android 10 | Android 14 |
Detailed comparison will load when you open this tab.
Key Differences
Only the differences that meaningfully separate these phones.
Price
USD 78 cheaper
Y200 256GBUSD 235
vsF17 ProUSD 313
Storage
2× more storage
Y200 256GB256 GB
vsF17 Pro128 GB
Battery
25% larger battery
Y200 256GB5,000 mAh
vsF17 Pro4,015 mAh
Charging
50 W faster wired charging
Y200 256GB80 W wired
vsF17 Pro30 W wired
Performance
Different chipsets
F17 ProMediaTek Helio P95
vsY200 256GBQualcomm Snapdragon 685
Display
Larger120Hz
Y200 256GB6.67″ · 120Hz
vsF17 Pro6.43″ · 60Hz
Build
24 g lighter
F17 Pro164 g
vsY200 256GB188 g
Best For
Where each phone stands out based on this comparison.
Best if you want
More compactOPPO F17 Pro
Lighter build164 g
Best if you want
More hardwareVivo Y200 256GB
Much lower purchase priceUSD 235
More storage256 GB
Larger battery5,000 mAh
Faster wired charging80 W wired
What CompareTab says about OPPO F17 Pro vs Vivo Y200 256GB
Vivo Y200 256GB has the larger display and faster wired charging than F17 Pro, with 256 GB of storage versus 128 GB, a 5000 mAh battery versus 4015 mAh, a 120 Hz display instead of 60 Hz, and 80 W wired charging versus 30 W. It also adds a higher-resolution front camera (32 MP versus 16 MP). OPPO F17 Pro, however, is lighter at 164 g versus 188 g and thinner at 7.48 mm versus 7.79 mm. The choice comes down to Y200 256GB’s storage, faster charging, battery capacity, smoother display, and higher-resolution front camera versus F17 Pro’s lighter, thinner build.
