OPPO A7 Pro Max 5G
$325
Compare Mobiles
vivo Y32 (2026)
$251
| A7 Pro Max 5G | Y32 (2026) | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | USD 325 | USD 251 |
| Battery | 10000 mAh | 8000 mAh |
| Charging (W) | 80 | 44 |
| RAM | 8 GB | 4 GB |
| Storage | 256 GB | 128 GB |
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 5 | UNISOC T7300 |
| Display | 6.78" • Flexible AMOLED • 120Hz | 6.87" • LCD • 120Hz |
| Main Camera | 50MP | 50MP |
| Front Camera | 50MP | 8MP |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 16 |
Detailed comparison will load when you open this tab.
Key Differences
Only the differences that meaningfully separate these phones.
Price
USD 74 cheaper
Y32 (2026)USD 251
vsA7 Pro Max 5GUSD 325
RAM
2× more RAM
A7 Pro Max 5G8 GB RAM
vsY32 (2026)4 GB RAM
Storage
2× more storage
A7 Pro Max 5G256 GB
vsY32 (2026)128 GB
Battery
25% larger battery
A7 Pro Max 5G10,000 mAh
vsY32 (2026)8,000 mAh
Charging
36 W faster wired charging
A7 Pro Max 5G80 W wired
vsY32 (2026)44 W wired
Performance
Different chipsets
A7 Pro Max 5GQualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 5
vsY32 (2026)UNISOC T7300
Camera
Higher-resolution front camera
A7 Pro Max 5G50MP front
vsY32 (2026)8MP front
Best For
Where each phone stands out based on this comparison.
Best if you want
More hardwareOPPO A7 Pro Max 5G
More RAM and storage8 GB RAM · 256 GB
Larger battery10,000 mAh
Faster wired charging80 W wired
Higher-resolution front camera50MP front
Best if you want
Lower pricevivo Y32 (2026)
Much lower purchase priceUSD 251
What CompareTab says about OPPO A7 Pro Max 5G vs vivo Y32 (2026)
OPPO A7 Pro Max 5G combines more RAM and storage with faster wired charging than Y32 (2026), with 8 GB of RAM versus 4 GB, 256 GB of storage versus 128 GB, a 10000 mAh battery versus 8000 mAh, and 80 W wired charging versus 44 W. It also adds a higher-resolution front camera (50 MP versus 8 MP). vivo Y32 (2026), however, is around $74.00 cheaper. The choice comes down to A7 Pro Max 5G’s extra RAM, storage, faster charging, battery capacity, and higher-resolution front camera versus Y32 (2026)’s lower price.
