OPPO A1K
$125
OPPO A1K vs POCO F9 Pro
POCO F9 Pro
$699
| A1K | F9 Pro | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | USD 125 | USD 699 |
| Battery | 4000 mAh | 6330 mAh |
| Charging (W) | 10 | 100 |
| RAM | 2 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage | 32 GB | 256 GB |
| Chipset | MediaTek Helio P22 MT6762R | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 V Series (SM8850-1-AB) |
| Display | 6.1" • IPS LCD • 60Hz | 6.59" • AMOLED • 185Hz |
| Main Camera | 8MP | 200MP |
| Front Camera | 5MP | 32MP |
| OS | Android 9 Pie | Android 16 |
Detailed comparison will load when you open this tab.
Key Differences
Only the differences that meaningfully separate these phones.
Price
USD 574 cheaper
A1KUSD 125
vsF9 ProUSD 699
RAM
6× more RAM
F9 Pro12 GB RAM
vsA1K2 GB RAM
Storage
8× more storage
F9 Pro256 GB
vsA1K32 GB
Battery
58% larger battery
F9 Pro6,330 mAh
vsA1K4,000 mAh
Charging
90 W faster wired charging
F9 Pro100 W wired
vsA1K10 W wired
Performance
Different chipsets
A1KMediaTek Helio P22 MT6762R
vsF9 ProQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 V Series (SM8850-1-AB)
Display
Larger185Hz
F9 Pro6.59″ · 185Hz
vsA1K6.1″ · 60Hz
Best For
Where each phone stands out based on this comparison.
Best if you want
Lower priceOPPO A1K
Much lower purchase priceUSD 125
Smaller 6.1-inch display6.1″
Best if you want
More hardwarePOCO F9 Pro
More RAM and storage12 GB RAM · 256 GB
Larger battery6,330 mAh
Faster wired charging100 W wired
Larger 185Hz display6.59″ · 185Hz
What CompareTab says about OPPO A1K vs POCO F9 Pro
POCO F9 Pro has clear advantages in memory, battery capacity and display refresh rate over A1K, with 12 GB of RAM versus 2 GB, 256 GB of storage versus 32 GB, a 6330 mAh battery versus 4000 mAh, and a 185 Hz display instead of 60 Hz. It also adds a higher-resolution rear camera (200 MP versus 8 MP), optical image stabilization on the main camera, an ultrawide rear camera, and 100W charging. OPPO A1K, however, is around $574 cheaper, lighter at 170 g versus 206 g, and thinner at 8.4 mm versus 8.79 mm. The choice comes down to F9 Pro’s extra RAM, storage, faster charging, battery capacity, and smoother display versus A1K’s lower price and lighter, thinner build.
