Nothing Phone 2a
$349
Nothing Phone 2a vs POCO F9 Pro
POCO F9 Pro
$699
| Phone 2a | F9 Pro | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | USD 349 | USD 699 |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 6330 mAh |
| Charging (W) | 45 | 100 |
| RAM | 8 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 7200 Pro | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 V Series (SM8850-1-AB) |
| Display | 6.7" • Flexible AMOLED • 120Hz | 6.59" • AMOLED • 185Hz |
| Main Camera | 50MP | 200MP |
| Front Camera | 32MP | 32MP |
| OS | Android 14 | Android 16 |
Detailed comparison will load when you open this tab.
Key Differences
Only the differences that meaningfully separate these phones.
Price
USD 350 cheaper
Phone 2aUSD 349
vsF9 ProUSD 699
RAM
4 GB more RAM
F9 Pro12 GB RAM
vsPhone 2a8 GB RAM
Storage
2× more storage
F9 Pro256 GB
vsPhone 2a128 GB
Battery
27% larger battery
F9 Pro6,330 mAh
vsPhone 2a5,000 mAh
Charging
55 W faster wired charging
F9 Pro100 W wired
vsPhone 2a45 W wired
Performance
Different chipsets
Phone 2aMediaTek Dimensity 7200 Pro
vsF9 ProQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 V Series (SM8850-1-AB)
Display
185 Hz refresh
F9 Pro185 Hz
vsPhone 2a120 Hz
Best For
Where each phone stands out based on this comparison.
Best if you want
Lower priceNothing Phone 2a
Much lower purchase priceUSD 349
Best if you want
More hardwarePOCO F9 Pro
More RAM and storage12 GB RAM · 256 GB
Larger battery6,330 mAh
Faster wired charging100 W wired
Up to 185 Hz display6.59-inch
What CompareTab says about Nothing Phone 2a vs POCO F9 Pro
POCO F9 Pro has clear advantages in memory, battery capacity and display refresh rate over Phone 2a, with 12 GB of RAM versus 8 GB, 256 GB of storage versus 128 GB, a 6330 mAh battery versus 5000 mAh, and a 185 Hz display instead of 120 Hz. It also adds a higher-resolution rear camera (200 MP versus 50 MP), a telephoto rear camera, wireless charging, and 100W charging. Nothing Phone 2a, however, is around $350 cheaper and lighter at 190 g versus 206 g. The main trade-off is the F9 Pro’s extra RAM, storage, faster charging, battery capacity, and smoother display versus the Phone 2a’s lower price and lighter build.
