motorola Razr 40 Ultra vs vivo X300 E

close
motorola Razr 40 Ultra

motorola Razr 40 Ultra

$1,099

8 GB RAM 256 GB

close
vivo X300 E

vivo X300 E

$719

12 GB RAM 256 GB

Razr 40 UltraX300 E
PriceUSD 1,099USD 719
Battery3800 mAh7200 mAh
Charging (W)3090
RAM8 GB12 GB
Storage256 GB256 GB
ChipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5
Display6.9" • Foldable LTPO AMOLED pOLED • 165Hz6.59" • AMOLED • 144Hz
Main Camera12MP50MP
Front Camera32MP50MP
OSAndroid 13Android 16

Detailed comparison will load when you open this tab.

Key Differences

Only the differences that meaningfully separate these phones.

Price
USD 380 cheaper
vsRazr 40 UltraUSD 1,099
RAM
4 GB more RAM
vsRazr 40 Ultra8 GB RAM
Battery
89% larger battery
vsRazr 40 Ultra3,800 mAh
Charging
60 W faster wired charging
vsRazr 40 Ultra30 W wired
Performance
Different chipsets
vsX300 EQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5
Display
Larger165Hz
vsX300 E6.59″ · 144Hz
Build
15 g lighter
vsX300 E199.5 g

Best For

Where each phone stands out based on this comparison.

Best if you want

motorola Razr 40 Ultra

More compact
Larger 165Hz display6.9″ · 165Hz
Lighter build184.5 g
Best if you want

vivo X300 E

More hardware
Much lower purchase priceUSD 719
More RAM12 GB RAM
Larger battery7,200 mAh
Faster wired charging90 W wired

What CompareTab says about motorola Razr 40 Ultra vs vivo X300 E

vivo X300 E offers more RAM and faster wired charging than Razr 40 Ultra, with 12 GB of RAM versus 8 GB, a 7200 mAh battery versus 3800 mAh, and 90 W wired charging versus 30 W. It also adds a higher-resolution rear camera (50 MP versus 12 MP), a higher-resolution front camera (50 MP versus 32 MP), and a telephoto rear camera. motorola Razr 40 Ultra, however, is lighter at 184.5 g versus 199.5 g and thinner at 6.99 mm versus 7.79 mm and has a larger 6.9 inch display. The choice comes down to X300 E’s extra RAM, faster charging, battery capacity, and camera features versus Razr 40 Ultra’s larger display and lighter, thinner build.