motorola Razr 40 Ultra
$1,099
motorola Razr 40 Ultra vs Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
$1,300
| Razr 40 Ultra | Galaxy S25 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | USD 1,099 | USD 1,300 |
| Battery | 3800 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Charging (W) | 30 | 45 |
| RAM | 8 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy |
| Display | 6.9" • Foldable LTPO AMOLED pOLED • 165Hz | 6.9" • Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2X • 120Hz |
| Main Camera | 12MP | 200MP |
| Front Camera | 32MP | 12MP |
| OS | Android 13 | Android 15 |
Detailed comparison will load when you open this tab.
Key Differences
Only the differences that meaningfully separate these phones.
Price
USD 200.99 cheaper
Razr 40 UltraUSD 1,099
vsGalaxy S25 UltraUSD 1,300
RAM
4 GB more RAM
Galaxy S25 Ultra12 GB RAM
vsRazr 40 Ultra8 GB RAM
Battery
32% larger battery
Galaxy S25 Ultra5,000 mAh
vsRazr 40 Ultra3,800 mAh
Charging
15 W faster wired charging
Galaxy S25 Ultra45 W wired
vsRazr 40 Ultra30 W wired
Performance
Different chipsets
Razr 40 UltraQualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1
vsGalaxy S25 UltraQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy
Display
165 Hz refresh
Razr 40 Ultra165 Hz
vsGalaxy S25 Ultra120 Hz
Build
34 g lighter
Razr 40 Ultra184.5 g
vsGalaxy S25 Ultra218 g
Best For
Where each phone stands out based on this comparison.
Best if you want
Lower pricemotorola Razr 40 Ultra
Much lower purchase priceUSD 1,099
Up to 165 Hz display6.9-inch
Lighter build184.5 g
Best if you want
More hardwareSamsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
More RAM12 GB RAM
Larger battery5,000 mAh
Faster wired charging45 W wired
What CompareTab says about motorola Razr 40 Ultra vs Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra offers more RAM and faster wired charging than Razr 40 Ultra, with 12 GB of RAM versus 8 GB, a 5000 mAh battery versus 3800 mAh, and 45 W wired charging versus 30 W. It also adds a higher-resolution rear camera (200 MP versus 12 MP) and a telephoto rear camera. motorola Razr 40 Ultra, however, is around $201 cheaper, lighter at 184.5 g versus 218 g, and thinner at 6.99 mm versus 8.2 mm and has a higher-resolution 32 MP front camera. The main trade-off is the Galaxy S25 Ultra’s extra RAM, faster charging, battery capacity, and camera features versus the Razr 40 Ultra’s lower price, lighter, thinner build, and higher-resolution front camera.
