motorola Razr 40 Ultra vs POCO F9 Ultra

close
motorola Razr 40 Ultra

motorola Razr 40 Ultra

$1,099

8 GB RAM 256 GB

close
POCO F9 Ultra

POCO F9 Ultra

$799

12 GB RAM 256 GB

Razr 40 UltraF9 Ultra
PriceUSD 1,099USD 799
Battery3800 mAh8050 mAh
Charging (W)30100
RAM8 GB12 GB
Storage256 GB256 GB
ChipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 (SM8850-AC)
Display6.9" • Foldable LTPO AMOLED pOLED • 165Hz6.9" • AMOLED • 185Hz
Main Camera12MP200MP
Front Camera32MP32MP
OSAndroid 13Android 16

Detailed comparison will load when you open this tab.

Key Differences

Only the differences that meaningfully separate these phones.

Price
USD 300 cheaper
vsRazr 40 UltraUSD 1,099
RAM
4 GB more RAM
vsRazr 40 Ultra8 GB RAM
Battery
112% larger battery
vsRazr 40 Ultra3,800 mAh
Charging
70 W faster wired charging
vsRazr 40 Ultra30 W wired
Performance
Different chipsets
vsF9 UltraQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 (SM8850-AC)
Display
185 Hz refresh
vsRazr 40 Ultra165 Hz
Build
51 g lighter
vsF9 Ultra235 g

Best For

Where each phone stands out based on this comparison.

Best if you want

motorola Razr 40 Ultra

More compact
Lighter build184.5 g
Best if you want

POCO F9 Ultra

More hardware
Much lower purchase priceUSD 799
More RAM12 GB RAM
Larger battery8,050 mAh
Faster wired charging100 W wired

What CompareTab says about motorola Razr 40 Ultra vs POCO F9 Ultra

POCO F9 Ultra offers more RAM and faster wired charging than Razr 40 Ultra, with 12 GB of RAM versus 8 GB, a 8050 mAh battery versus 3800 mAh, a 185 Hz display instead of 165 Hz, and 100 W wired charging versus 30 W. It also adds a higher-resolution rear camera (200 MP versus 12 MP) and a telephoto rear camera. motorola Razr 40 Ultra, however, is lighter at 184.5 g versus 235 g and thinner at 6.99 mm versus 8.74 mm. The main trade-off is F9 Ultra’s extra RAM, faster charging, battery capacity, smoother display, and camera features versus Razr 40 Ultra’s lighter, thinner build.