Motorola edge 60 fusion vs Samsung Galaxy M35

close
Motorola edge 60 fusion

Motorola edge 60 fusion

$390

8 GB RAM 256 GB

close
Samsung Galaxy M35

Samsung Galaxy M35

$293

8 GB RAM 256 GB

edge 60 fusionGalaxy M35
PriceUSD 390USD 293
Battery5200 mAh6000 mAh
Charging (W)6825
RAM8 GB8 GB
Storage256 GB256 GB
ChipsetMediaTek Dimensity 7300Samsung Exynos 1380
Display6.67" • Quad-curved pOLED • 120Hz6.6" • Super AMOLED • 120Hz
Main Camera50MP50MP
Front Camera32MP13MP
OSAndroid 15Android 14

Detailed comparison will load when you open this tab.

Key Differences

Only the differences that meaningfully separate these phones.

Price
USD 97 cheaper
vsedge 60 fusionUSD 390
Battery
15% larger battery
vsedge 60 fusion5,200 mAh
Charging
43 W faster wired charging
vsGalaxy M3525 W wired
Performance
Different chipsets
vsGalaxy M35Samsung Exynos 1380
Build
42 g lighter
vsGalaxy M35222 g
Build
More compact thickness
vsGalaxy M359.1 mm
Camera
Higher-resolution front camera
vsGalaxy M3513MP front

Best For

Where each phone stands out based on this comparison.

Best if you want

Motorola edge 60 fusion

More hardware
Faster wired charging68 W wired
Lighter build180 g
Thinner body8.25 mm
Higher-resolution front camera32MP front
Best if you want

Samsung Galaxy M35

Lower price
Much lower purchase priceUSD 293
Larger battery6,000 mAh

What CompareTab says about Motorola edge 60 fusion vs Samsung Galaxy M35

Samsung Galaxy M35 has a larger battery than edge 60 fusion, with a 6000 mAh battery versus 5200 mAh. Motorola edge 60 fusion, however, is lighter at 180 g versus 222 g and thinner at 8.25 mm versus 9.1 mm, has higher quoted peak brightness at 4500 nits versus 1000 nits, and supports faster wired charging at 68 W versus 25 W. The choice comes down to Galaxy M35’s battery capacity versus edge 60 fusion’s higher quoted peak brightness, faster charging, and lighter, thinner build.