Huawei enjoy 80
$165
Huawei Enjoy 80 vs OPPO A7 Pro Max 5G
OPPO A7 Pro Max 5G
$325
| enjoy 80 | A7 Pro Max 5G | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | USD 165 | USD 325 |
| Battery | 6620 mAh | 10000 mAh |
| Charging (W) | 40 | 80 |
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Chipset | N/A | Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 5 |
| Display | 6.67" • LCD (IPS LCD) • 90Hz | 6.78" • Flexible AMOLED • 120Hz |
| Main Camera | 50MP | 50MP |
| Front Camera | 8MP | 50MP |
| OS | HarmonyOS 4.0 | Android 16 |
Detailed comparison will load when you open this tab.
Key Differences
Only the differences that meaningfully separate these phones.
Price
USD 160 cheaper
enjoy 80USD 165
vsA7 Pro Max 5GUSD 325
Storage
2× more storage
A7 Pro Max 5G256 GB
vsenjoy 80128 GB
Battery
51% larger battery
A7 Pro Max 5G10,000 mAh
vsenjoy 806,620 mAh
Charging
40 W faster wired charging
A7 Pro Max 5G80 W wired
vsenjoy 8040 W wired
Display
120 Hz refresh
A7 Pro Max 5G120 Hz
vsenjoy 8090 Hz
Build
21 g lighter
enjoy 80203 g
vsA7 Pro Max 5G224 g
Camera
Higher-resolution front camera
A7 Pro Max 5G50MP front
vsenjoy 808MP front
Best For
Where each phone stands out based on this comparison.
Best if you want
Lower priceHuawei enjoy 80
Much lower purchase priceUSD 165
Lighter build203 g
Best if you want
More hardwareOPPO A7 Pro Max 5G
More storage256 GB
Larger battery10,000 mAh
Faster wired charging80 W wired
Up to 120 Hz display6.78-inch
What CompareTab says about Huawei enjoy 80 vs OPPO A7 Pro Max 5G
OPPO A7 Pro Max 5G has the larger display and faster wired charging than enjoy 80, with 256 GB of storage versus 128 GB, a 10000 mAh battery versus 6620 mAh, a 120 Hz display instead of 90 Hz, and 80 W wired charging versus 40 W. It also adds a higher-resolution front camera (50 MP versus 8 MP) and 5G. Huawei enjoy 80, however, is around $160 cheaper, lighter at 203 g versus 224 g, and thinner at 8.25 mm versus 8.57 mm. The choice comes down to A7 Pro Max 5G’s storage, faster charging, battery capacity, smoother display, and higher-resolution front camera versus enjoy 80’s lower price and lighter, thinner build.
