Boltt Evo 4G
$116
Boltt Evo 4G vs TCL 501
TCL 501
$69
| Evo 4G | 501 | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | USD 116 | USD 69 |
| Battery | 6000 mAh | 3000 mAh |
| Charging (W) | N/A | 10 |
| RAM | 4 GB | 2 GB |
| Storage | 64 GB | 32 GB |
| Chipset | Unisoc T7250 | MediaTek Helio G36 MT6765X |
| Display | 6.79" • LCD • 120Hz | 6" • IPS LCD • 60Hz |
| Main Camera | 50MP | 5MP |
| Front Camera | 8MP | 2MP |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 14 Go edition |
Detailed comparison will load when you open this tab.
Key Differences
Only the differences that meaningfully separate these phones.
Price
USD 47 cheaper
501USD 69
vsEvo 4GUSD 116
RAM
2× more RAM
Evo 4G4 GB RAM
vs5012 GB RAM
Storage
2× more storage
Evo 4G64 GB
vs50132 GB
Battery
100% larger battery
Evo 4G6,000 mAh
vs5013,000 mAh
Performance
Different chipsets
Evo 4GUnisoc T7250
vs501MediaTek Helio G36 MT6765X
Display
Larger120Hz
Evo 4G6.79″ · 120Hz
vs5016″ · 60Hz
Build
55 g lighter
501178.5 g
vsEvo 4G233 g
Best For
Where each phone stands out based on this comparison.
Best if you want
More hardwareBoltt Evo 4G
More RAM and storage4 GB RAM · 64 GB
Larger battery6,000 mAh
Larger 120Hz display6.79″ · 120Hz
Best if you want
Lower priceTCL 501
Much lower purchase priceUSD 69
Lighter build178.5 g
Smaller 6-inch display6″
What CompareTab says about Boltt Evo 4G vs TCL 501
Boltt Evo 4G offers more RAM, storage, battery capacity and a smoother display than 501, with 4 GB of RAM versus 2 GB, 64 GB of storage versus 32 GB, a 6000 mAh battery versus 3000 mAh, and a 120 Hz display instead of 60 Hz. It also adds a higher-resolution rear camera (50 MP versus 5 MP) and a higher-resolution front camera (8 MP versus 2 MP). TCL 501, however, is cheaper at around $69 versus $116 and lighter at 178.5 g versus 233 g. The main trade-off is the Evo 4G’s extra RAM, storage, battery capacity, smoother display, and higher-resolution cameras versus the 501’s lower price and lighter build.
