Alcatel Pixi
$99
Alcatel Pixi vs Xiaomi Redmi K100
Xiaomi Redmi K100
$525
| Pixi | Redmi K100 | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | USD 99 | USD 525 |
| Battery | 1300 mAh | 10000 mAh |
| Charging (W) | 5 | 100 |
| RAM | N/A | 12 GB |
| Storage | N/A | 256 GB |
| Chipset | Qualcomm MSM7227A | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite |
| Display | 3.5" • TFT LCD • 60Hz | 6.83" • AMOLED • 165Hz |
| Main Camera | 2MP | 50MP |
| Front Camera | 0MP | 20MP |
| OS | Android 2.3.6 Gingerbread | Android 17 |
Detailed comparison will load when you open this tab.
Key Differences
Only the differences that meaningfully separate these phones.
Price
USD 426 cheaper
PixiUSD 99
vsRedmi K100USD 525
RAM
12 GB more RAM
Redmi K10012 GB RAM
vsPixi0 GB RAM
Storage
256 GB more storage
Redmi K100256 GB
vsPixi0 GB
Battery
669% larger battery
Redmi K10010,000 mAh
vsPixi1,300 mAh
Charging
95 W faster wired charging
Redmi K100100 W wired
vsPixi5 W wired
Performance
Different chipsets
PixiQualcomm MSM7227A
vsRedmi K100Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
Display
Larger165Hz
Redmi K1006.83″ · 165Hz
vsPixi3.5″ · 60Hz
Best For
Where each phone stands out based on this comparison.
Best if you want
Lower priceAlcatel Pixi
Much lower purchase priceUSD 99
Smaller 3.5-inch display3.5″
Best if you want
More hardwareXiaomi Redmi K100
More RAM and storage12 GB RAM · 256 GB
Larger battery10,000 mAh
Faster wired charging100 W wired
Larger 165Hz display6.83″ · 165Hz
What CompareTab says about Alcatel Pixi vs Xiaomi Redmi K100
Xiaomi Redmi K100 offers more RAM, storage, battery capacity and a smoother display than Pixi, with 12 GB of RAM versus 0.26 GB, 256 GB of storage versus 0.51 GB, a 10000 mAh battery versus 1300 mAh, and a 165 Hz display instead of 60 Hz. It also adds a higher-resolution rear camera (50 MP versus 2 MP), a higher-resolution front camera (20 MP versus 0 MP), optical image stabilization on the main camera, and 100W charging. Alcatel Pixi, however, is around $426 cheaper and lighter at 118 g versus 234.5 g. The main trade-off is Redmi K100’s extra RAM, storage, faster charging, battery capacity, and smoother display versus Pixi’s lower price and lighter build.
