Alcatel Pixi
$99
Alcatel Pixi vs Oukitel C26 Mini
Oukitel C26 Mini
$190
| Pixi | C26 Mini | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | USD 99 | USD 190 |
| Battery | 1300 mAh | 2300 mAh |
| Charging (W) | 5 | 10 |
| RAM | N/A | 3 GB |
| Storage | N/A | 32 GB |
| Chipset | Qualcomm MSM7227A | Unisoc T610 |
| Display | 3.5" • TFT LCD • 60Hz | 4" • TFT • 60Hz |
| Main Camera | 2MP | 13MP |
| Front Camera | 0MP | 5MP |
| OS | Android 2.3.6 Gingerbread | Android 16 |
Detailed comparison will load when you open this tab.
Key Differences
Only the differences that meaningfully separate these phones.
Price
USD 91 cheaper
PixiUSD 99
vsC26 MiniUSD 190
RAM
3 GB more RAM
C26 Mini3 GB RAM
vsPixi0 GB RAM
Storage
32 GB more storage
C26 Mini32 GB
vsPixi0 GB
Battery
77% larger battery
C26 Mini2,300 mAh
vsPixi1,300 mAh
Charging
5 W faster wired charging
C26 Mini10 W wired
vsPixi5 W wired
Performance
Different chipsets
PixiQualcomm MSM7227A
vsC26 MiniUnisoc T610
Display
Larger display
C26 Mini4-inch
vsPixi3.5-inch
Best For
Where each phone stands out based on this comparison.
Best if you want
Lower priceAlcatel Pixi
Much lower purchase priceUSD 99
Smaller 3.5-inch display3.5″
Best if you want
More hardwareOukitel C26 Mini
More RAM and storage3 GB RAM · 32 GB
Larger battery2,300 mAh
Faster wired charging10 W wired
Larger 4-inch4-inch
What CompareTab says about Alcatel Pixi vs Oukitel C26 Mini
Oukitel C26 Mini offers more RAM, storage and a larger battery than Pixi, with 3 GB of RAM versus 0.26 GB, 32 GB of storage versus 0.51 GB, a 2300 mAh battery versus 1300 mAh, and a 4 inch display versus 3.5 inch. It also adds a higher-resolution rear camera (13 MP versus 2 MP), a higher-resolution front camera (5 MP versus 0 MP), and 10W charging. Alcatel Pixi, however, is around $91.00 cheaper and thinner at 12.2 mm versus 12.9 mm. The main trade-off is C26 Mini’s extra RAM, storage, faster charging, battery capacity, and larger display versus Pixi’s lower price and thinner body.
