Acer neoTouch P400 vs Samsung Galaxy F35 5G

close
Acer neoTouch P400

Acer neoTouch P400

$399

0 GB RAM 0 GB

close
Samsung Galaxy F35 5G

Samsung Galaxy F35 5G

$299

8 GB RAM 256 GB

neoTouch P400Galaxy F35 5G
PriceUSD 399USD 299
Battery1090 mAh6000 mAh
Charging (W)525
RAMN/A8 GB
StorageN/A256 GB
ChipsetQualcomm MSM7227Samsung Exynos 1380
Display3.2" • TFT resistive touchscreen • 60Hz6.6" • Super AMOLED • 120Hz
Main Camera3.15MP50MP
Front Camera0MP13MP
OSMicrosoft Windows Mobile 6.5.3 ProfessionalAndroid 14

Detailed comparison will load when you open this tab.

Key Differences

Only the differences that meaningfully separate these phones.

Price
USD 100 cheaper
vsneoTouch P400USD 399
RAM
8 GB more RAM
vsneoTouch P4000 GB RAM
Storage
256 GB more storage
vsneoTouch P4000 GB
Battery
450% larger battery
vsneoTouch P4001,090 mAh
Charging
20 W faster wired charging
vsneoTouch P4005 W wired
Performance
Different chipsets
vsGalaxy F35 5GSamsung Exynos 1380
Display
Larger120Hz
vsneoTouch P4003.2″ · 60Hz

Best For

Where each phone stands out based on this comparison.

Best if you want

Samsung Galaxy F35 5G

More hardware
Much lower purchase priceUSD 299
More RAM and storage8 GB RAM · 256 GB
Larger battery6,000 mAh
Faster wired charging25 W wired

What CompareTab says about Acer neoTouch P400 vs Samsung Galaxy F35 5G

Samsung Galaxy F35 5G offers more RAM, storage, battery capacity and a smoother display than neoTouch P400, with 8 GB of RAM versus 0.26 GB, 256 GB of storage versus 0.51 GB, a 6000 mAh battery versus 1090 mAh, and a 120 Hz display instead of 60 Hz. It also adds a higher-resolution rear camera (50 MP versus 3.15 MP), a higher-resolution front camera (13 MP versus 0 MP), optical image stabilization on the main camera, and 25W charging. Acer neoTouch P400, however, is lighter at 125 g versus 222 g. The main trade-off is Galaxy F35 5G’s extra RAM, storage, faster charging, battery capacity, and smoother display versus neoTouch P400’s lighter build.