Acer CloudMobile vs Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 256GB

close
Acer CloudMobile

Acer CloudMobile

$466

1 GB RAM 8 GB

close
Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 256GB

Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 256GB

$770

8 GB RAM 256 GB

CloudMobileGalaxy S21 FE 256GB
PriceUSD 466USD 770
Battery1460 mAh4500 mAh
Charging (W)N/A25
RAM1 GB8 GB
Storage8 GB256 GB
ChipsetQualcomm MSM8260A Snapdragon S4 PlusSamsung Exynos 2100
Display4.3" • IPS LCD • 60Hz6.4" • Dynamic AMOLED 2X • 120Hz
Main Camera8MP12MP
Front Camera0.9MP32MP
OSAndroid 4.0.4 Ice Cream SandwichAndroid 12

Detailed comparison will load when you open this tab.

Key Differences

Only the differences that meaningfully separate these phones.

Price
USD 303.99 cheaper
vsGalaxy S21 FE 256GBUSD 770
RAM
8× more RAM
vsCloudMobile1 GB RAM
Storage
32× more storage
vsCloudMobile8 GB
Battery
208% larger battery
vsCloudMobile1,460 mAh
Performance
Different chipsets
vsGalaxy S21 FE 256GBSamsung Exynos 2100
Display
Larger120Hz
vsCloudMobile4.3″ · 60Hz
Build
55 g lighter
vsGalaxy S21 FE 256GB177 g

Best For

Where each phone stands out based on this comparison.

Best if you want

Acer CloudMobile

Lower price
Much lower purchase priceUSD 466
Lighter build122 g
Smaller 4.3-inch display4.3″
Best if you want

Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 256GB

More hardware
More RAM and storage8 GB RAM · 256 GB
Larger battery4,500 mAh
Larger 120Hz display6.4″ · 120Hz

What CompareTab says about Acer CloudMobile vs Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 256GB

Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 256GB offers more RAM, storage, battery capacity and a smoother display than CloudMobile, with 8 GB of RAM versus 1 GB, 256 GB of storage versus 8 GB, a 4500 mAh battery versus 1460 mAh, and a 120 Hz display instead of 60 Hz. It also adds a higher-resolution front camera (32 MP versus 0.9 MP), optical image stabilization on the main camera, and an ultrawide rear camera. Acer CloudMobile, however, is around $304 cheaper and lighter at 122 g versus 177 g. The main trade-off is Galaxy S21 FE 256GB’s extra RAM, storage, battery capacity, smoother display, and OIS-equipped camera setup versus CloudMobile’s lower price and lighter build.