Vivo Y400 5G
$249
Vivo Y400 5G vs OPPO A16
OPPO A16
$190
| Y400 5G | A16 | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | USD 249 | USD 190 |
| Battery | 6000 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Charging (W) | 90 | 10 |
| RAM | 8 GB | 4 GB |
| Storage | 128 GB | 64 GB |
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 | MediaTek Helio G35 |
| Display | 6.67" • AMOLED • 120Hz | 6.52" • IPS LCD • 60Hz |
| Main Camera | 50MP | 13MP |
| Front Camera | 32MP | 8MP |
| OS | Android 15 | Android 11 |
Detailed comparison will load when you open this tab.
Key Differences
Only the differences that meaningfully separate these phones.
Price
USD 59 cheaper
A16USD 190
vsY400 5GUSD 249
RAM
2× more RAM
Y400 5G8 GB RAM
vsA164 GB RAM
Storage
2× more storage
Y400 5G128 GB
vsA1664 GB
Battery
20% larger battery
Y400 5G6,000 mAh
vsA165,000 mAh
Charging
80 W faster wired charging
Y400 5G90 W wired
vsA1610 W wired
Performance
Different chipsets
Y400 5GQualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2
vsA16MediaTek Helio G35
Display
Larger120Hz
Y400 5G6.67″ · 120Hz
vsA166.52″ · 60Hz
Best For
Where each phone stands out based on this comparison.
Best if you want
More hardwareVivo Y400 5G
More RAM and storage8 GB RAM · 128 GB
Larger battery6,000 mAh
Faster wired charging90 W wired
Larger 120Hz display6.67″ · 120Hz
Best if you want
Lower priceOPPO A16
Much lower purchase priceUSD 190
Smaller 6.52-inch display6.52″
What CompareTab says about Vivo Y400 5G vs OPPO A16
Vivo Y400 5G offers more RAM, storage, battery capacity and a smoother display than A16, with 8 GB of RAM versus 4 GB, 128 GB of storage versus 64 GB, a 6000 mAh battery versus 5000 mAh, and a 120 Hz display instead of 60 Hz. It also adds a higher-resolution rear camera (50 MP versus 13 MP), a higher-resolution front camera (32 MP versus 8 MP), and 90W charging. OPPO A16, however, is around $59.00 cheaper. The choice comes down to Y400 5G’s extra RAM, storage, faster charging, battery capacity, and smoother display versus A16’s lower price.
