vivo V80
$707
vivo V80 vs OPPO Reno 16c
OPPO Reno 16c
$539
| V80 | Reno 16c | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | USD 707 | USD 539 |
| Battery | 7200 mAh | 7000 mAh |
| Charging (W) | 90 | 80 |
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage | 256 GB | 128 GB |
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 4 (SM7750-AB) | MediaTek Dimensity 7300-Energy |
| Display | 6.59" • AMOLED • 144Hz | 6.57" • Crystal Guard AMOLED • 120Hz |
| Main Camera | 50MP | 50MP |
| Front Camera | 50MP | 50MP |
| OS | Android 17 | Android 16 |
Detailed comparison will load when you open this tab.
Key Differences
Only the differences that meaningfully separate these phones.
Price
USD 168 cheaper
Reno 16cUSD 539
vsV80USD 707
Storage
2× more storage
V80256 GB
vsReno 16c128 GB
Battery
200 mAh larger battery
V807,200 mAh
vsReno 16c7,000 mAh
Charging
10 W faster wired charging
V8090 W wired
vsReno 16c80 W wired
Performance
Different chipsets
V80Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 4 (SM7750-AB)
vsReno 16cMediaTek Dimensity 7300-Energy
Display
144 Hz refresh
V80144 Hz
vsReno 16c120 Hz
Build
8 g lighter
Reno 16c195 g
vsV80203 g
Best For
Where each phone stands out based on this comparison.
Best if you want
More hardwarevivo V80
More storage256 GB
Larger battery7,200 mAh
Faster wired charging90 W wired
Up to 144 Hz display6.59-inch
Best if you want
Lower priceOPPO Reno 16c
Much lower purchase priceUSD 539
Lighter build195 g
What CompareTab says about vivo V80 vs OPPO Reno 16c
vivo V80 has the larger display and faster wired charging than Reno 16c, with 256 GB of storage versus 128 GB, a 7200 mAh battery versus 7000 mAh, a 144 Hz display instead of 120 Hz, and 90 W wired charging versus 80 W. It also adds NFC. OPPO Reno 16c, however, is around $168 cheaper and lighter at 195 g versus 203 g. The choice comes down to V80’s storage, faster charging, battery capacity, and smoother display versus Reno 16c’s lower price and lighter build.
