ZTE Blade A52
$120
ZTE Blade A52 vs POCO F9 Pro
POCO F9 Pro
$699
| Blade A52 | F9 Pro | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | USD 120 | USD 699 |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 6330 mAh |
| Charging (W) | 10 | 100 |
| RAM | 3 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage | 64 GB | 256 GB |
| Chipset | Unisoc SC9863A | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 V Series (SM8850-1-AB) |
| Display | 6.52" • IPS LCD • 60Hz | 6.59" • AMOLED • 185Hz |
| Main Camera | 13MP | 200MP |
| Front Camera | 5MP | 32MP |
| OS | Android 11 | Android 16 |
Detailed comparison will load when you open this tab.
Key Differences
Only the differences that meaningfully separate these phones.
Price
USD 579 cheaper
Blade A52USD 120
vsF9 ProUSD 699
RAM
4× more RAM
F9 Pro12 GB RAM
vsBlade A523 GB RAM
Storage
4× more storage
F9 Pro256 GB
vsBlade A5264 GB
Battery
27% larger battery
F9 Pro6,330 mAh
vsBlade A525,000 mAh
Charging
90 W faster wired charging
F9 Pro100 W wired
vsBlade A5210 W wired
Performance
Different chipsets
Blade A52Unisoc SC9863A
vsF9 ProQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 V Series (SM8850-1-AB)
Display
185 Hz refresh
F9 Pro185 Hz
vsBlade A5260 Hz
Best For
Where each phone stands out based on this comparison.
Best if you want
Lower priceZTE Blade A52
Much lower purchase priceUSD 120
Best if you want
More hardwarePOCO F9 Pro
More RAM and storage12 GB RAM · 256 GB
Larger battery6,330 mAh
Faster wired charging100 W wired
Up to 185 Hz display6.59-inch
What CompareTab says about ZTE Blade A52 vs POCO F9 Pro
POCO F9 Pro offers more RAM, storage, battery capacity and a smoother display than Blade A52, with 12 GB of RAM versus 3 GB, 256 GB of storage versus 64 GB, a 6330 mAh battery versus 5000 mAh, and a 185 Hz display instead of 60 Hz. It also adds a higher-resolution rear camera (200 MP versus 13 MP), optical image stabilization on the main camera, an ultrawide rear camera, and 100W charging. ZTE Blade A52, however, is around $579 cheaper. The choice comes down to F9 Pro’s extra RAM, storage, faster charging, battery capacity, and smoother display versus Blade A52’s lower price.
