Xiaomi Redmi 13C vs Alcatel One Touch Fire

close
Xiaomi Redmi 13C

Xiaomi Redmi 13C

$139

8 GB RAM 256 GB

close
Alcatel One Touch Fire

Alcatel One Touch Fire

$89

256 GB RAM 512 GB

Redmi 13COne Touch Fire
PriceUSD 139USD 89
Battery5000 mAh1400 mAh
Charging (W)185
RAM8 GB256 GB
Storage256 GB512 GB
ChipsetMediaTek Helio G85Qualcomm Snapdragon S1 MSM7227A
Display6.74" • IPS LCD • 90Hz3.5" • TFT LCD • 60Hz
Main Camera50MP3.15MP
Front Camera8MP0MP
OSAndroid 13Firefox OS 1.0.1

Detailed comparison will load when you open this tab.

Key Differences

Only the differences that meaningfully separate these phones.

Price
USD 50 cheaper
vsRedmi 13CUSD 139
RAM
32× more RAM
vsRedmi 13C8 GB RAM
Storage
2× more storage
vsRedmi 13C256 GB
Battery
257% larger battery
vsOne Touch Fire1,400 mAh
Charging
13 W faster wired charging
vsOne Touch Fire5 W wired
Performance
Different chipsets
vsOne Touch FireQualcomm Snapdragon S1 MSM7227A
Display
Larger90Hz
vsOne Touch Fire3.5″ · 60Hz

Best For

Where each phone stands out based on this comparison.

Best if you want

Xiaomi Redmi 13C

More hardware
Larger battery5,000 mAh
Faster wired charging18 W wired
Larger 90Hz display6.74″ · 90Hz
Best if you want

Alcatel One Touch Fire

Lower price
Much lower purchase priceUSD 89
More RAM and storage256 GB RAM · 512 GB
Smaller 3.5-inch display3.5″

What CompareTab says about Xiaomi Redmi 13C vs Alcatel One Touch Fire

Xiaomi Redmi 13C has the larger display and faster wired charging than One Touch Fire, with a 5000 mAh battery versus 1400 mAh, a 90 Hz display instead of 60 Hz, and 18 W wired charging versus 5 W. It also adds a higher-resolution rear camera (50 MP versus 3.15 MP), a higher-resolution front camera (8 MP versus 0 MP), and NFC. Alcatel One Touch Fire, however, is around $50.00 cheaper and lighter at 108 g versus 192 g and offers 256 GB of RAM versus 8 GB and 512 GB of storage versus 256 GB. The main trade-off is the Redmi 13C’s faster charging, battery capacity, smoother display, and higher-resolution cameras versus the One Touch Fire’s lower price and lighter build.