Xiaomi 17 Ultra
$1,749
Xiaomi 17 Ultra vs Tecno Spark 50C
Tecno Spark 50C
$178
| 17 Ultra | Spark 50C | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | USD 1,749 | USD 178 |
| Battery | 6000 mAh | 5200 mAh |
| Charging (W) | 90 | 15 |
| RAM | 16 GB | 4 GB |
| Storage | 512 GB | 64 GB |
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | MediaTek Helio G81 |
| Display | 6.9" • Xiaomi HyperRGB LTPO OLED • 120Hz | 6.78" • IPS LCD • 120Hz |
| Main Camera | 50MP | 13MP |
| Front Camera | 50MP | 8MP |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 16 |
Detailed comparison will load when you open this tab.
Key Differences
Only the differences that meaningfully separate these phones.
Price
USD 1,571 cheaper
Spark 50CUSD 178
vs17 UltraUSD 1,749
RAM
4× more RAM
17 Ultra16 GB RAM
vsSpark 50C4 GB RAM
Storage
8× more storage
17 Ultra512 GB
vsSpark 50C64 GB
Battery
15% larger battery
17 Ultra6,000 mAh
vsSpark 50C5,200 mAh
Charging
75 W faster wired charging
17 Ultra90 W wired
vsSpark 50C15 W wired
Performance
Different chipsets
17 UltraQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
vsSpark 50CMediaTek Helio G81
Camera
Higher resolution
17 Ultra50MP rear · 50MP front
vsSpark 50C13MP rear · 8MP front
Best For
Where each phone stands out based on this comparison.
Best if you want
More hardwareXiaomi 17 Ultra
More RAM and storage16 GB RAM · 512 GB
Larger battery6,000 mAh
Faster wired charging90 W wired
Higher-resolution cameras50MP rear · 50MP front
Best if you want
Lower priceTecno Spark 50C
Much lower purchase priceUSD 178
What CompareTab says about Xiaomi 17 Ultra vs Tecno Spark 50C
Xiaomi 17 Ultra combines more RAM and storage with faster wired charging than Spark 50C, with 16 GB of RAM versus 4 GB, 512 GB of storage versus 64 GB, a 6000 mAh battery versus 5200 mAh, and 90 W wired charging versus 15 W. It also adds a higher-resolution rear camera (50 MP versus 13 MP), a higher-resolution front camera (50 MP versus 8 MP), and a telephoto rear camera. Tecno Spark 50C, however, is around $1,571 cheaper and thinner at 7.9 mm versus 8.29 mm. The main trade-off is the 17 Ultra’s extra RAM, storage, faster charging, battery capacity, and camera features versus the Spark 50C’s lower price and thinner body.
