Vivo Y02t
$175
Vivo Y02t vs POCO F9 Pro
POCO F9 Pro
$699
| Y02t | F9 Pro | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | USD 175 | USD 699 |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 6330 mAh |
| Charging (W) | 10 | 100 |
| RAM | 4 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage | 64 GB | 256 GB |
| Chipset | MediaTek Helio P35 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 V Series (SM8850-1-AB) |
| Display | 6.51" • IPS LCD • 60Hz | 6.59" • AMOLED • 185Hz |
| Main Camera | 8MP | 200MP |
| Front Camera | 5MP | 32MP |
| OS | Android 13 | Android 16 |
Detailed comparison will load when you open this tab.
Key Differences
Only the differences that meaningfully separate these phones.
Price
USD 524 cheaper
Y02tUSD 175
vsF9 ProUSD 699
RAM
3× more RAM
F9 Pro12 GB RAM
vsY02t4 GB RAM
Storage
4× more storage
F9 Pro256 GB
vsY02t64 GB
Battery
27% larger battery
F9 Pro6,330 mAh
vsY02t5,000 mAh
Charging
90 W faster wired charging
F9 Pro100 W wired
vsY02t10 W wired
Performance
Different chipsets
Y02tMediaTek Helio P35
vsF9 ProQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 V Series (SM8850-1-AB)
Display
185 Hz refresh
F9 Pro185 Hz
vsY02t60 Hz
Best For
Where each phone stands out based on this comparison.
Best if you want
Lower priceVivo Y02t
Much lower purchase priceUSD 175
Best if you want
More hardwarePOCO F9 Pro
More RAM and storage12 GB RAM · 256 GB
Larger battery6,330 mAh
Faster wired charging100 W wired
Up to 185 Hz display6.59-inch
What CompareTab says about Vivo Y02t vs POCO F9 Pro
POCO F9 Pro offers more RAM, storage, battery capacity and a smoother display than Y02t, with 12 GB of RAM versus 4 GB, 256 GB of storage versus 64 GB, a 6330 mAh battery versus 5000 mAh, and a 185 Hz display instead of 60 Hz. It also adds a higher-resolution rear camera (200 MP versus 8 MP), optical image stabilization on the main camera, an ultrawide rear camera, and 100W charging. Vivo Y02t, however, is around $524 cheaper and lighter at 186 g versus 206 g. The main trade-off is the F9 Pro’s extra RAM, storage, faster charging, battery capacity, and smoother display versus the Y02t’s lower price and lighter build.
