Vivo X200 Ultra vs Tecno Spark 50C

close
Vivo X200 Ultra

Vivo X200 Ultra

$850

12 GB RAM 256 GB

close
Tecno Spark 50C

Tecno Spark 50C

$178

4 GB RAM 64 GB

X200 UltraSpark 50C
PriceUSD 850USD 178
Battery6000 mAh5200 mAh
Charging (W)9015
RAM12 GB4 GB
Storage256 GB64 GB
ChipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite (SM8750-AB)MediaTek Helio G81
Display6.82" • LTPO AMOLED • 120Hz6.78" • IPS LCD • 120Hz
Main Camera50MP13MP
Front Camera50MP8MP
OSAndroid 15Android 16

Detailed comparison will load when you open this tab.

Key Differences

Only the differences that meaningfully separate these phones.

Price
USD 672 cheaper
vsX200 UltraUSD 850
RAM
3× more RAM
vsSpark 50C4 GB RAM
Storage
4× more storage
vsSpark 50C64 GB
Battery
15% larger battery
vsSpark 50C5,200 mAh
Charging
75 W faster wired charging
vsSpark 50C15 W wired
Performance
Different chipsets
vsSpark 50CMediaTek Helio G81
Camera
Higher resolution
vsSpark 50C13MP rear · 8MP front

Best For

Where each phone stands out based on this comparison.

Best if you want

Vivo X200 Ultra

More hardware
More RAM and storage12 GB RAM · 256 GB
Larger battery6,000 mAh
Faster wired charging90 W wired
Higher-resolution cameras50MP rear · 50MP front
Best if you want

Tecno Spark 50C

Lower price
Much lower purchase priceUSD 178

What CompareTab says about Vivo X200 Ultra vs Tecno Spark 50C

Vivo X200 Ultra combines more RAM and storage with faster wired charging than Spark 50C, with 12 GB of RAM versus 4 GB, 256 GB of storage versus 64 GB, a 6000 mAh battery versus 5200 mAh, and 90 W wired charging versus 15 W. It also adds a higher-resolution rear camera (50 MP versus 13 MP), a higher-resolution front camera (50 MP versus 8 MP), and an ultrawide rear camera. Tecno Spark 50C, however, is around $672 cheaper and thinner at 7.9 mm versus 8.7 mm. The main trade-off is X200 Ultra’s extra RAM, storage, faster charging, battery capacity, and camera features versus Spark 50C’s lower price and thinner body.