Vivo X200 Pro Mini vs POCO F9 Ultra

close
Vivo X200 Pro Mini

Vivo X200 Pro Mini

$655

12 GB RAM 256 GB

close
POCO F9 Ultra

POCO F9 Ultra

$799

12 GB RAM 256 GB

X200 Pro MiniF9 Ultra
PriceUSD 655USD 799
Battery5700 mAh8050 mAh
Charging (W)90100
RAM12 GB12 GB
Storage256 GB256 GB
ChipsetMediaTek Dimensity 9400Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 (SM8850-AC)
Display6.31" • LTPO AMOLED • 120Hz6.9" • AMOLED • 185Hz
Main Camera50MP200MP
Front Camera32MP32MP
OSAndroid 15Android 16

Detailed comparison will load when you open this tab.

Key Differences

Only the differences that meaningfully separate these phones.

Price
USD 144 cheaper
vsF9 UltraUSD 799
Battery
41% larger battery
vsX200 Pro Mini5,700 mAh
Charging
10 W faster wired charging
vsX200 Pro Mini90 W wired
Performance
Different chipsets
vsF9 UltraQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 (SM8850-AC)
Display
Larger185Hz
vsX200 Pro Mini6.31″ · 120Hz
Build
48 g lighter
vsF9 Ultra235 g
Camera
Higher-resolution main camera
vsX200 Pro Mini50MP rear

Best For

Where each phone stands out based on this comparison.

Best if you want

Vivo X200 Pro Mini

Lower price
Much lower purchase priceUSD 655
Lighter build187 g
Smaller 6.31-inch display6.31″
Best if you want

POCO F9 Ultra

More hardware
Larger battery8,050 mAh
Faster wired charging100 W wired
Larger 185Hz display6.9″ · 185Hz
Higher-resolution main camera200MP rear

What CompareTab says about Vivo X200 Pro Mini vs POCO F9 Ultra

POCO F9 Ultra has the larger display and faster wired charging than X200 Pro Mini, with a 8050 mAh battery versus 5700 mAh, a 185 Hz display instead of 120 Hz, and 100 W wired charging versus 90 W. It also adds a higher-resolution rear camera (200 MP versus 50 MP). Vivo X200 Pro Mini, however, is around $144 cheaper, lighter at 187 g versus 235 g, and thinner at 8.15 mm versus 8.74 mm. The choice comes down to F9 Ultra’s faster charging, battery capacity, smoother display, and higher-resolution front camera versus X200 Pro Mini’s lower price and lighter, thinner build.