Tecno Camon 16
$149
Tecno Camon 16 vs ZTE Blade A35
ZTE Blade A35
$99
| Camon 16 | Blade A35 | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | USD 149 | USD 99 |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Charging (W) | 18 | 10 |
| RAM | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Storage | 128 GB | 64 GB |
| Chipset | MediaTek Helio G70 | UNISOC SC9863A1 |
| Display | 6.8" • IPS LCD • 60Hz | 6.75" • IPS LCD • 90Hz |
| Main Camera | 48MP | 8MP |
| Front Camera | 16MP | 5MP |
| OS | Android 10 | Android 14 |
Detailed comparison will load when you open this tab.
Key Differences
Only the differences that meaningfully separate these phones.
Price
USD 50 cheaper
Blade A35USD 99
vsCamon 16USD 149
Storage
2× more storage
Camon 16128 GB
vsBlade A3564 GB
Charging
8 W faster wired charging
Camon 1618 W wired
vsBlade A3510 W wired
Performance
Different chipsets
Camon 16MediaTek Helio G70
vsBlade A35UNISOC SC9863A1
Display
90 Hz refresh
Blade A3590 Hz
vsCamon 1660 Hz
Camera
Higher resolution
Camon 1648MP rear · 16MP front
vsBlade A358MP rear · 5MP front
Build
More compact thickness
Blade A358.5 mm
vsCamon 169.2 mm
Best For
Where each phone stands out based on this comparison.
Best if you want
More hardwareTecno Camon 16
More storage128 GB
Faster wired charging18 W wired
Higher-resolution cameras48MP rear · 16MP front
Best if you want
Lower priceZTE Blade A35
Much lower purchase priceUSD 99
Up to 90 Hz display6.75-inch
Thinner body8.5 mm
What CompareTab says about Tecno Camon 16 vs ZTE Blade A35
Tecno Camon 16 offers more storage than Blade A35, with 128 GB of storage versus 64 GB and 18 W wired charging versus 10 W. It also adds a higher-resolution rear camera (48 MP versus 8 MP) and a higher-resolution front camera (16 MP versus 5 MP). ZTE Blade A35, however, is around $50.00 cheaper and thinner at 8.5 mm versus 9.2 mm. The main trade-off is the Camon 16’s storage, faster charging, and higher-resolution cameras versus the Blade A35’s lower price and thinner body.
