TCL 30 5G
$276
TCL 30 5G vs POCO F9 Pro
POCO F9 Pro
$699
| 30 5G | F9 Pro | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | USD 276 | USD 699 |
| Battery | 5010 mAh | 6330 mAh |
| Charging (W) | 18 | 100 |
| RAM | 4 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage | 64 GB | 256 GB |
| Chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 700 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 V Series (SM8850-1-AB) |
| Display | 6.7" • AMOLED • 60Hz | 6.59" • AMOLED • 185Hz |
| Main Camera | 50MP | 200MP |
| Front Camera | 13MP | 32MP |
| OS | Android 12 | Android 16 |
Detailed comparison will load when you open this tab.
Key Differences
Only the differences that meaningfully separate these phones.
Price
USD 423 cheaper
30 5GUSD 276
vsF9 ProUSD 699
RAM
3× more RAM
F9 Pro12 GB RAM
vs30 5G4 GB RAM
Storage
4× more storage
F9 Pro256 GB
vs30 5G64 GB
Battery
26% larger battery
F9 Pro6,330 mAh
vs30 5G5,010 mAh
Charging
82 W faster wired charging
F9 Pro100 W wired
vs30 5G18 W wired
Performance
Different chipsets
30 5GMediaTek Dimensity 700
vsF9 ProQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 V Series (SM8850-1-AB)
Display
185 Hz refresh
F9 Pro185 Hz
vs30 5G60 Hz
Best For
Where each phone stands out based on this comparison.
Best if you want
Lower priceTCL 30 5G
Much lower purchase priceUSD 276
Best if you want
More hardwarePOCO F9 Pro
More RAM and storage12 GB RAM · 256 GB
Larger battery6,330 mAh
Faster wired charging100 W wired
Up to 185 Hz display6.59-inch
What CompareTab says about TCL 30 5G vs POCO F9 Pro
POCO F9 Pro has clear advantages in memory, battery capacity and display refresh rate over 30 5G, with 12 GB of RAM versus 4 GB, 256 GB of storage versus 64 GB, a 6330 mAh battery versus 5010 mAh, and a 185 Hz display instead of 60 Hz. It also adds a higher-resolution rear camera (200 MP versus 50 MP), optical image stabilization on the main camera, an ultrawide rear camera, and 100W charging. TCL 30 5G, however, is around $423 cheaper, lighter at 184 g versus 206 g, and thinner at 7.74 mm versus 8.79 mm. The main trade-off is the F9 Pro’s extra RAM, storage, faster charging, battery capacity, and smoother display versus the 30 5G’s lower price and lighter, thinner build.
